Announcing the Latin East Initiative

Announcing the Latin East Initiative

Announcing the Latin East Initiative

By : The Latin East Initiative Editors

[Jadaliyya is happy to announce the launching of The Latin East initiative, a joint collaboration with the North American Congress on Latin America (NACLA) and the Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP). So far, the initiative has resulted in the publication of special issues by both NACLA Report and Middle East Report as well as an international conference hosted at NYU on 27-28 April 2018.

You can access the full contents of both NACLA and Middle East Report Latin East issues online.

Most of the articles published in the NACLA and MERIP special issues were presented by their authors at the conference held at NYU and you can access them by following the links above. Below we provide an overview of the initiative’s rationale and scope. In addition, Jadaliyya is pleased to publish two original essays by Professors Rania Jawad and Amal Eqeiq that did not make it into the special volumes, as well as comments by the discussants Professors Ella Shohat, Ali Mirsepassi, Arang Keshavarzian, and Eiman Morsi.]

On Jadaliyya, this initiative is being introduced in a roundtable presented through a series of articles related to the themes of the conference. They are as follows:

Of Borders and Limits: Comparative Indigeneity in Mexico and Palestine by Amal Eqeiq

Comments on The Politics of Art: Readings, Reflections, and Refractions by Eman Morsi

Trajectories of Travel: Augusto Boal’s Liberatory Theatre Practice in Palestine by Rania Jawad

Comments on Confluences and Cartographies of the Latin East by Ali Mirsepassi

Comments on Trans-Regional Studies by Ella Shohat

________________

At the height of Latin America’s “pink tide” in the mid-2000s, left-wing governments throughout the region developed unprecedented economic, political, and cultural ties with the Arab world as part of a larger effort to disrupt US hegemony globally. Meanwhile, in the Middle East, entrenched power regimes seemed to teeter against a wave of social and political movements broadly identified as the Arab Spring. Today, as the Pink Tide recedes and renewed conflict and authoritarianism grips the Middle East, the time is ripe to consider the origins, contours, and legacies of a relationship forged in a moment of deep regional and global flux, between parts of the world infrequently considered side by side.

The Latin East Initiative is organized around three broad themes: The first is Latin America in the Middle East. Due to the legacy of successive waves of migration from the Middle East to the Latin America in the twentieth century, most accounts of the relationship between both regions have focused on Middle Eastern influence in Latin America. However, as contributors under this theme reveal, Latin America’s influence in the Middle East, direct and indirect, is deep, longstanding, and wide-ranging, appearing in politics, economics, culture, and ideology. Comparative Regionalism is our second organizing theme. It features contributions that focus on how democracy, neoliberalism, post-neoliberal development, political parties, and social movements manifest themselves similarly or differently in both regions. Our third thematic area examines recent history. Here, contributors consider social movements, political, economic and cultural exchanges, and transnational solidarity and diaspora politics in light of the Arab Spring and winter, and against the backdrop of nearly two decades of left-wing governance in Latin America.

On 27 - 28 April 2018, NACLAMERIP (Middle East Research and Information Project), and Jadaliyya convened scholars, artists, and activists for a two-day international conference at New York University to explore new and longstanding links between Latin America and the Middle East. Contributors considered social movements, cultural exchanges, political and economic institutions, and transnational solidarity and diaspora politics in light of the Arab Spring and winter, and against the backdrop of nearly two decades of left-wing governance in Latin America.

Panel 1: The Politics of Art: Readings, Reflections, and Refractions

Houzan Mahmoud & Ismail Hamalaw (Kurdish Culture Project) “The Latin Boom in Kurdistan”

Lena Meari (Birzeit University) “Reading Che in Colonized Palestine”

Roosbelinda Cardenas (Hampshire College) & Hiba Bou Akar (Columbia University) “Writing About Violence in Latin America and the Middle East”

 Sinan Antoon (New York University, Jadaliyya) “Reading Vallejo in Arabic”

Rania Jawad (Birzeit University) “Traveling Pedagogies and Theaters of Violence”

Discussant: Eman Morsi (Dartmouth University)

Panel 2: Political Parallels and Economic Intersections

Paul Amar (University of California, Santa Barbara) “Military Capitalism”

Kaveh Ehsani ( Depaul University) “ Blessing or Curse? Resource Nationalism to Neoliberalism in Latin American and the Middle East”

Cecilia Baeza (Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sau Paulo) & Paulo Pinto (Universidade Federal Fluminense) “The Syrian Uprising and the Arab Diaspora in Argentina and Brazil”

Paulo Farah (Universidade de Sao Paulo) “South-South Solidarity and South America-Arab Countries (ASPA) Cooperation Mechanism”

Discussant: Arang Keshavarzian (New York University)

Panel 3: Mapping Solidarities

Tariq Dana (Doha Institute) “Palestine Beyond Slogans”

Sara Awartani (George Washington University) “Puerto Rican Decolonization: Armed Struggle and the Question of Palestine”

Nadim Bawalsa (New York University) “Palestine West of the Andes”

Omar Tesdell (Birzeit University) “Planting Roots, Claiming Space”

Amal Eqeiq (Williams College) “Of Borders and Limits: Comparative Indigeneity”

Discussant: Ella Shohat (New York University)

Panel 4: Confluences and Cartographies

Fernando Camacho Padilla (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) “Teaching Latin America in Tehran”

Marwan Kraidy (University of Pennsylvania) “A Tale of Two Modernities”

Kevan Harris (UCLA) “Divergent Histories and Converging Inequalities in the Middle East and Latin America”

Omar Dahi (Hampshire College) & Alejandro Velasco (New York University) “Latin America-Middle East Ties in the New Global South” 

Discussant: Ali Mirsepassi (New York University)

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412