From the Editors
The New York Times says Jadaliyya "Brings New Life to Arab Studies." Read about it by clicking here.
Contesting Narratives, Locating Power (Lund Conference)
The most spectacular effects of the January 25th uprising have been in the change of persons and institutions: the televised speeches, the constitutional declarations and voting, and, of course, the stirring visuals from Tahrir Square. To this point, however, the protesters’ most substantive achievements have played out on the level of norms. The eighteen days of demonstrations that brought about President Hosni Mubarak’s resignation opened a redefinition of what was possible and what was acceptable. In particular, the youth movement at the core of the uprising has contested the security mindset that characterized Mubarak’s government and its most important international relationships.
It is too soon to conduct a detailed comparison of standard practices in the Mubarak and post-Mubarak eras. Instead, this paper examines Egypt’s relations with the United States during the past decade, a period of active cooperation toward shared security goals. Chief among these aims is countering Iranian influence by undermining Hamas in the Gaza Strip. As demonstrated by the anxious reactions of Washington and Jerusalem, popular sovereignty in Egypt could jeopardize this arrangement. After providing that background, the paper turns to changes in Egyptian policy on security issues that have occurred since the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) took power from Mubarak and vice president Omar Suleiman. Although active participants in Tahrir Square protests constitute a small (and electorally negligible) share of the public, their persistent efforts have carried counter hegemonic effects. They have succeeded in unsettling the taken-for-granted quality by which rulers treated the Egyptian people and US strategists regarded the Egyptian government.
With respect to the broader revolutionary movements sweeping the region since January, Egypt provides one of the most transformed cases in a still fluid set of developments. My own view is that we should set aside parallels with Eastern Europe in 1989, where outcomes were highly homogenous and democratic, and instead recall sub-Saharan Africa in the early 1990s. In that region major political upheaval delivered a wide variety of outcomes, ranging from new democracies to re-calibrated autocracies. A second point for this work It is vital that political scientists and their students set aside the comparative politics/international relations division; it is a dated tool for bureaucratic organization within departments that obstructs critical inquiry. A simple paradigm replacement would be thinking in terms of "international politics" or "world politics."
One of the most helpful pedagogical gains from the uprisings is that it underscores the anti-essentialist tenet of recognizing how Arabs represent themselves and speak for themselves: they do not need western surrogates speaking on their behalf, much less portraying them in tendentious terms. It would be interesting to see how students now respond to core texts from Edward Said and Bernard "Arabs don't revolt, they just get aroused" Lewis. In closing I would just add that it is a bit difficult to say how this year's events will affect my scholarship and teaching because we do not yet have outcomes. For example, if a SCAF proxy wins Egypt's presidential election and continues ruling under Emergency Law-like strictures, we may see much more continuity than the dramatic ouster of Mubarak implied.
Jad NavigationView Full Map, Topics, and Countries »
"A main objective behind these unwritten regulations [of entry to public spaces] is promoting a suitable environment for capital investments and high-end consumption… for them, public spaces should be exclusive of lower income groups whose practices do not qualify as tasteful according to their social position."click | email | tweet
Jadalicious / جدلشس
Cities Media Roundup (August 2015) http://t.co/4lsw4LmjLF
yesterday at 8:02 AM
Israel’s Defeat on the Iran Deal http://t.co/nWAkAqVCLA
yesterday at 6:50 AM
Lebanon: What Do You Mean There Is No State? http://t.co/5snno2goG6
on Saturday 29 August at 08:33 AM
Beirut Revolt: What Is to be Done? http://t.co/4tIGgPq51s
on Saturday 29 August at 08:03 AM
Open Letter to Mr. Bilal Hamad, President of the Municipal Council of Beirut http://t.co/pOgCWAYHp2
on Friday 28 August at 09:52 PM
Latest EntriesView All Entries »
- Cities Media Roundup (August 2015)
- Israel’s Defeat on the Iran Deal
- Lebanon: What Do You Mean There Is No State?
- Beirut Revolt: What Is to be Done?
- Quick Thoughts: Moe Ali Nayel on Lebanon’s Garbage Crisis and Protest Movement
- Internships At ASI (& Internships for College Credit Program)
- Vangelis Kehriyotis anisina
- STATUS/الوضع: Issue 2.2 is Live!
- Lebanon, August 2015: Notes on Paralysis, Protests, and Hope
- في تعاقب المنافي، ستحملنا الريح إلى الوطن
- New Texts Out Now: Gary Wilder, Freedom Time: Negritude, Decolonization, and the Future of the World
- قدّروا شجاعة الرجل
- Arabian Peninsula Media Roundup (August 25)
- Palestine Media Roundup (July 20- August 15)
- Turkey Media Roundup (August 25)
- Israel: Where do the Mizrahim Fit In? (Part 2)
- Israel: Where do the Mizrahim fit in? (Part 1)
- The Reality of Ethnic Cleansing and Kurdish State in Syria
- The Good, the Bad and the Crimson Shoe
- Ekin Wan’in bedeninde ifsa olan devlet ya da kadinlar sira bizde