From the Editors
The New York Times says Jadaliyya "Brings New Life to Arab Studies." Read about it by clicking here.
Contesting Narratives, Locating Power (Lund Conference)
The legacy of Egypt’s 1952 revolution was one of mobilization but, importantly, of exclusions as well – exclusion of women and of Islamists, for instance. In the wake of the 2011 revolution, the question emerges: Is it possible to conceive an Egyptian nationalism that mobilizes without excluding? The struggle for a pluralistic Egyptian nationalism is, to my mind, the greatest legacy of the January 25th revolution. And one of the greatest tests of the revolution’s success or failure will be how Egyptian nationalism is redefined to accommodate Egypt’s Coptic Christian minority.
In the past, the invocation of the ‘national unity discourse’ has sufficed to accommodate Copts. Advocates of this discourse have ventured so far as to deny the existence of a Coptic minority within Egyptian borders altogether. Within this framework, sectarianism has taken on the guise of an aberrant distraction from the solidarity of the Egyptian people.
Yet, in early March 2011, a Coptic sit-in brought to a halt all traffic in front of the Radio and Television Building in downtown Cairo. The ostensible cause of the protest was the destruction of a church in the Hilwan governorate. I would suggest, though, that the Coptic protests need to be understood as a call for acknowledgment of contemporary Coptic life and culture, of a distinctive Coptic identity.
Indeed, what seems to have eluded partisans of the ‘national unity discourse,’ is that this Coptic identity carries enormous import for various parts of the community. I might add that this has eluded scholarly observers of Egypt abroad, as well. If one judges their importance in contemporary Egypt by the extent to which they attract attention from scholarly observers, one might well conclude that Copts have a negligible impact on Egyptian social, political, or cultural life. There are, for instance, practically no histories of the Coptic community or Coptic social life in the English language. This has made teaching about a vital facet of diversity and pluralism within the Egyptian nation difficult, if not impossible.
Copts appear to attract attention from Western scholars only in so far as they attract attention from Egyptian Islamists, and never for the dynamics of their own community. A case in point: I was delighted by the recent publication of a book whose subtitle reads Non-Muslims and the Egyptian State, convinced that this text would accord serious and sustained attention to the implications of the distinctly Coptic culture I have referenced. Yet, in this book that is explicitly dedicated to non-Muslims and their relations with the Egyptian state, the text is overwhelmingly concerned with Islamist thinkers and their vision of Egyptian citizenship. Coptic conceptions of citizenship are relegated to a chapter at the end entitled ‘Coptic Responses.’ The title of that chapter is highly revealing, for Copts seem only to exist for scholars of Egypt when they respond to Islamists.
Perhaps the greatest testimony to the post-revolutionary Coptic demand for acknowledgment, is how protesters have transformed the phrase ‘Irfaa raasak ya achi, inta Misri’ (‘Raise your head my brother, you are Egyptian’), much in circulation now as a mark of newfound, revolutionary pride in the nation, into ‘Irfaa raasak ya achi, inta Qibti’ (‘Raise your head my brother, you are a Copt’). In much the way that this act of naming held tremendous importance for Egyptians when the words came from Nasser in the 1950s, recasting the formulation as an acknowledgment of Coptic life and community had tremendous importance for Copts as they stood before the Radio and Television Building in March 2011. And much as the Egyptian national community must reckon with this demand for acknowledgment, so too must scholars of Egypt, in both their research and their pedagogy.
Jad NavigationView Full Map, Topics, and Countries »
But in re-considering [Midnight’s Children] on the thirtieth anniversary of its publication, it is also worth thinking about some of the doors that have closed in the intervening three decades.click | email | tweet
Jadalicious / جدلشس
Turkey Media Roundup (July 28) http://t.co/tHKvGO7Us9
12 hours ago
#Beirut Today: @jadaliyya co-editors @ziadaburish & @mona_harb_ lead panel on #Lebanon in 1940s & 50s http://t.co/A1Rc5ZsRKo via @jadaliyya
12 hours ago
Last Week on Jadaliyya (July 20-26) http://t.co/p9tAWnMFlA
yesterday at 5:32 AM
Daoud’s Camus Fanfiction Is More of the Same http://t.co/1D5wizZzah
yesterday at 4:47 AM
Gay Hanging in Iran: Atrocities and Impersonations http://t.co/F773BNWoj7
yesterday at 11:56 PM
Latest EntriesView All Entries »
- Turkey Media Roundup (July 28)
- Last Week on Jadaliyya (July 20-26)
- Daoud’s Camus Fanfiction Is More of the Same
- تدمر، واحة للظلام
- Gay Hanging in Iran: Atrocities and Impersonations
- Quick Thoughts: John Reynolds on Recent Amendments to the Israeli Penal Code
- لا بشرٌ ولاحجر... تدمر وسرديات الحرب على الآثار
- Boycotting Israeli Academic Institutions: Advice for Anthropologists
- خلافـــــة الرئيـــس
- New Texts Out Now: Ali Issa, Against All Odds: Voices of Popular Struggle in Iraq
- New Texts Out Now: Franck Mermier, Récits de villes: d’Aden à Beyrouth
- Maghreb Media Roundup (July 22)
- Attacks against Solidarity with Kobane: The Suruç Massacre of Young Revolutionaries
- Why are LGBT Equality Organizations Joining Forces with Israel Advocacy Groups?
- Has Amnesty International Lost Its Way? A Forensic Analysis of Amnesty’s Reports on Operation Protective Edge (Part 1)
- Arabian Peninsula Media Roundup (July 21)
- Turkey Media Roundup (July 21)
- وردة باراثِلسو: قصة للكاتب الأرجنتيني خورخِ لويس بورخِسْ
- Egypt Media Roundup (July 20)
- Beirut Event -- Lebanon in the 1940s and 1950s: A Panel Discussion (28 July 2015)