From the Editors
The New York Times says Jadaliyya "Brings New Life to Arab Studies." Read about it by clicking here.
Contesting Narratives, Locating Power (Lund Conference)
Even mention of my course’s title, human rights law in the Middle East evokes the inevitable snicker-what human rights in the Middle East? While true that the authoritarian landscape throughout the Middle East has marginalized any serious engagement with human rights, this discounts domestic struggles that have historically fought for human rights without using the discourse of the international legal canon. Moreover, in the aftermath of the revolutions that have swept North Africa and the upheavals that continue throughout the Arab world, there are at least three trends worth noting that will impact the way in which human rights is taught.
First, Israel has historically created a distinction between its violation of human rights vis-à-vis its Arab neighbors. By justifying its repression as a means of national security and self-defense, it has publicly challenged the application of human rights law to its practices by pointing to its Arab counterparts as more deserving of scrutiny. Israel has claimed that the human rights violations committed in the maintenance of authoritarian regimes is distinct from its human rights violations because the former is committed in the crude preservation of power. This discourse both obviates Israel’s apartheid regime and orientalizes human rights violations in the Middle East – our practices are justified, yours are categorically brutal. The uprisings throughout the Arab world and the brutal responses to them in the name of self-defense, which mirror Israel’s practices work to chip away at human rights’ orientalist discourse.
Second, it is worth noting that before, during, and after the revolutions and upheavals throughout the Arab world, the protestors did not use the international human rights legal canon to make its claims upon the State. Instead, it employed a political language of reform, revolution, and equality that resonated with demands for human dignity rather than those demanding compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights or other similar treaty. This comports with Hannah Arendt’s reflections on human rights as being a matter of human dignity activated by the assumption of individual and collective agency. While the international covenants remain useful in the realm of international advocacy their insignificance during the revolutions demonstrates their futility as mobilizing documents and discourses more generally. This of course is not a static condition and can be challenged by future movements throughout the region that may find greater strategic utility for the legal canon.
Finally, the revolutions and more specifically the political response and media coverage of them has unequivocally shattered the veneer of the universality of human rights. While the cornerstone of human rights practice is their universal character i.e., to be applied without distinction globally irrespective of local conditions and cultural nuances, the inconsistent response to the revolutions most notably demonstrated in the US’s support for Egyptian revolution and its support for the violent suppression of similar movements in Bahrain, has undermined this principle. The US is not alone in this response as has also been demonstrated by intervention in Libya and negligence in Yemen. Governments have not been alone in their disparate responses, as media outlets are also implicated in their distinct coverage. While this is not noteworthy to most critical observers, it does make explicit the very real interplay between law and politics in the realm of human rights that is often, and irresponsibly, trumped by asserting the universal nature of human rights.
Jad NavigationView Full Map, Topics, and Countries »
[I]t still seems acceptable to represent the Arab Gulf, in ways no longer so acceptable in the case of other postcolonies, ahistorically and apolitically, as a region ... exempt from the structural constraints of empire and capital.click | email | tweet
Jadalicious / جدلشس
RT @StatusHour: Short on time but want insightful updates on #SaudiArabia, #Syria, & social media trends? Check out “Quick Thoughts”! http:…
17 hours ago
RT @CarmenGeha: On teaching civic activism "Learning is enhanced when learners produce answers compared to having them recognize answers."…
18 hours ago
RT @CarmenGeha: Heartbroken that 3 activists who contributed to my PhD research have now been assassinated #Libya @AsfariInstitute
18 hours ago
el Seed and Aya Tarek Discuss Calligraffiti http://t.co/bwHVr3GKkU
yesterday at 7:58 AM
Egypt Monthly Edition on Jadaliyya (February 2015) http://t.co/wM5fibmMaF
on Thursday 05 March at 12:15 AM
Latest EntriesView All Entries »
- The Right to Food Safety: Rights-Based Dialogue as a Springboard towards State-Building
- el Seed and Aya Tarek Discuss Calligraffiti
- Egypt Monthly Edition on Jadaliyya (February 2015)
- Slurring Sectarianism: Sunni-Shi‘i Discourse in Lebanon
- New Media and the Spectacle of the War on Terror
- New Texts Out Now: Anthony Downey, Uncommon Grounds: New Media and Critical Practices in the Middle East and North Africa
- Last Week on Jadaliyya (February 23-March 2)
- Syria Media Roundup (March 2)
- Nada Baraka's Fractals
- Arabian Peninsula Media Roundup (March 3)
- Turkey Media Roundup (March 3)
- Egypt Media Roundup (March 2)
- ستاتوس\الوضع: العدد 2.1
- Mental Health Programs for Syrian Refugees
- DARS Media Roundup (February 2015)
- Cities Media Roundup (February 2015)
- Minyan Village Mourns: A Photographic Essay
- Burj el Imam: Music by Sharif Sehnaoui, Raed Yassin and Alan Bishop
- STATUS/الوضع: Issue 2.1 is Live!
- New Texts Out Now: Jonathan A.C. Brown, Misquoting Muhammad: The Challenges and Choices of Interpreting the Prophet’s Legacy