The Warraq Funeral: Between Sadness and Anger

[Coptic church in Cairo, Egypt. Image originally posted to Flickr by Ana Paula Hirama] [Coptic church in Cairo, Egypt. Image originally posted to Flickr by Ana Paula Hirama]

The Warraq Funeral: Between Sadness and Anger

By : Wael Eskandar

The entrance of the church had two minarets with a yellow cross on top of each. About fifty meters away from the church was a mosque, smaller in size and with two similarly looking but taller minarets. This was the Church of Warraq, where unknown gunmen shot at a wedding killing four and leaving eighteen injured. Those killed during the attack were either elderly or children, including an eight- and a twelve-year old.

Located north of Cairo, Warraq is a neighborhood that lies right next to the Nile in Giza past Agouza and Imbaba. As I approached, it looked like a different governorate altogether. The streets grew smaller and Central Security Forces personnel stationed outside of it were not wearing the usual black uniform, but rather a khaki colored outfit that is often seen in poorer governorates.

Along the road leading up to the church were numerous government buildings. The church is located near Warraq police station, which, as I learned, was attacked and burned after 14 August and had been abandoned ever since.

A few hundred people were present in the vicinity of the church as they waited for the bodies to arrive. Some of the coffins were smaller, because they presumably carried the two dead children.

As the coffins made their way through the crowds two chants often echoed by revolutionary activists were heard. “Martyr, rest in peace and we will continue the struggle” and “We will either bring justice to them, or die like them.” I could not help but wonder who this so-called struggle would be against. A woman outside was asking God to take his vengeance against the Muslim Brotherhood.

The church was much larger than it seemed from the outside. It was crowded, boisterous and full to the brim. Not everyone made it inside. Many had to stand outside, and some were watching a live feed of the service one floor above. The atmosphere never ceased to be tense. Shouting and mourning were continuous.

One night earlier a wedding service was taking place in that same church. A family that was enjoying wedding festivities a day ago was now in mourning at a funeral. As the priest read prayers, the call to Muslim prayers could be heard coming from outside . The chants interrupted the priest several times, much like the funeral service in the Coptic Cathedral for the Khusus victims in April 2013. Some people were hugging the coffins tightly as they wept.

Finally, the priest started his sermon. There was much glorification of martyrdom throughout his speech, but toward the end he spent quite a bit of time thanking church and public officials. He thanked the Pope and the many priests who offered their condolences. He then thanked state officials, including Giza’s governor and head of the security directorate. As he expressed his gratitude to the head of the security directorate, I wondered why anyone mourning the death of these victims would thank a negligent state that has failed to provide minimal protection for this church and over fifty others across Egypt. The priest then asserted that those who targeted the wedding were the same as those who attacked the conscripts in Sinai in August 2012. How he arrived at that conclusion was a big mystery to the audience.  Perhaps religious leaders are not really men of God, but men of state.


[Excerpts from funeral proceedings at Warraq Church.]

It was not obvious throughout the service how people were feeling and whom their anger was directed at. Did they even know? Was it only against the Muslim Brotherhood whose supporters and allies continued to incite against the Church? Or were they also angry at the state, which failed them and could not provide them with protection—a state that they could not afford to oppose because it supposedly “saved” them from the rule of the Brotherhood? How would they fight to bring about retribution for the dead without relying on a state that has continuously undermined their rights?

There was a mixture of anger and sadness in a scene that was part revolutionary, part reactionary. After the funeral, people congregated outside the church for a while to demonstrate their anger.

As I was leaving a woman came up to me and said, “The area is full of weapons. Whom do I report to if there is a coffee shop selling arms?”

Having thought about it for a few moments, I concluded that it would be useless to tell the police, since they are unlikely to take any action. But it seemed that she already knew that given that she chose to direct the question at me. Who do we appeal to when we want protection in our neighborhoods? Who do we tell? We are still on our own. Egypt is on her own.

  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • The Saudi Leaks and Egypt: A Recap

      The Saudi Leaks and Egypt: A Recap
      It was not long after Wikileaks had released the Saudi cables that the dirty laundry it revealed about Egypt’s political elite began circulating in news reports and social media. Although many of the
    • From the Elections to the Protest Law: Signs of Egypt's Future

      From the Elections to the Protest Law: Signs of Egypt's Future
      Whatever uncertainty as to what Egypt’s future holds after the recent inauguration of Abdel Fattah al-Sisi as president can now be set aside as we examine the regime’s most recent behavior. President
    • The Revenge of the Police State

      The Revenge of the Police State
      While the ongoing violence in Egypt has contributed to a state of confusion and polarization, one thing is certain: The biggest threat facing Egypt remains the return of the police state. More specif

Between Inaction and Complicity: The Shi‘a and the Brotherhood

Some have commented on the incident of sectarian violence in the village of Zawiyat Abu Musallam in the Giza district on 23 June 2013 as the product of a "simple" people and a "crowd" mentality. The figure of the "simple" like that of the "poor" have become straw men who liberals, leftists, and Islamists target as the cause of social illness and dysfunction. The murder of four Shiites that the artistic collective, Mosireen captured and documented in the video below is an ugly moment. It speaks volumes about two coinciding phenomena. On the one hand, it reflects a deep and broad discontent. Egyptians are finding it increasingly difficult to put bread on the table. It is usually in moments of deep economic crisis that the "minority" is both constructed and singled out for blame. On the other hand, this incident of cold-blooded intra-communal murder also speaks to the toxic power of political and religious leaders who incite hatred against the "other" to mask the very discontent and poverty that they are complicit in deepening. It was this toxic power that the village Imam was drunk on. 


Video testimony of attack on Shi`a community in Giza by Mosireen

It was this toxic power that Mohamed Morsi relied on in his recent performance at the Cairo International Stadium on 15 June 2013. The Egyptian president brought together a who`s who of Islamist politics in an extravaganza of political theater. He provided a platform for the most sectarian interlocutors. Ostensibly, they gathered to call against the Syrian regime and its allies. This pretense at solidarity with Syrian liberation was an unconvincing mask of sectarian regional positioning; it aimed at base to quench rising domestic discontent. After all, it was a short jump from the show of “solidarity” to the public demonization of Egypt’s Shi‘a. The President sat stoic, occasionally applauding as prominent Salafist sheikh Mohammad Hassan implored him to "not open Egypt`s doors to rejectionists." Another sheikh, Mohammed Abdelmaqsoud stood at the podium and declared Shi‘a "filthy" before launching into a tirade against "the enemies of Islam." 

This transparent incitement set the stage for the anemic governmental response to the sectarian violence that took place eight days later. It was instead non-governmental organizations and non-profit collectives that took immediate action. The Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights (EIPR) issued an incident report  that delved into the circumstances of the murders and featured detailed testimonies. Human Rights Watch released a report and called on the government to recognize and protect the equal rights of Egypt’s Shi‘a. A lethargic Morsi eventually released a generic statement  condemning the murders; it fell far short of emphasizing the Shi‘a as full and equal Egyptian citizens. 

Sectarianism in Egypt usually conjures two categories—the Copt and the Muslim. Last week it appeared that "Sunna" and "Shi‘a" were now in currency. The cold-blooded violence was, everyone agreed, a black day for the country.

But we should not fail to historicize these phenomena. The Muslim Brotherhood and their Islamist allies have done much to vilify Egypt’s Shi‘a. But the state has a longer trajectory of systematically marginalizing this community through targeted political arrest, accusations of treason and heresy, and the erasure of Egypt’s Shi‘i history under Fatimid rule.

In 1959, fatwas like that of the Azhar`s sheikh Mahmood Shaltoot attempted to reconcile sectarian differences by recognizing the Ja‘fari school of law. It was under Mubarak that the Azhar issued several edicts threatening Shi‘a from "spreading their faith." By the end of his era, hundreds of Shi‘a were behind bars on the grounds of "undermining national security and contempt for religion."

Many religious practices in Egypt today carry on Shi‘i tradition and unofficial estimates put Egypt`s Shi‘a between 800,000 to one million people. Yet despite all this, the Shi‘a are by virtue of the state’s enforced marginalization largely invisible. It is this institutionalized and systemic discrimination that is coming to the fore under Brotherhood rule. Television channels such as Al-Nas and Al-Hafeth (among the most ardent of Morsi`s supporters) spread vitriol and in some instances actively incite the public against Shi‘i Egyptians. 

Morsi and the Brotherhood have drafted one delayed statement after another decrying violence against one religious minority after another. Yet as blood spills, the presidency continues apace with the divisive and inflammatory sectarian discourse of its allies. In the best of cases we can call this leadership complacent. In the worst of cases we can point to the explicit incitement against religious minorities. Both cases amount to an endorsement of violence against a rapidly expanding category of the “other.” Both cases amount to complicity.

At no point in his two and a half hour speech of 26 June, meant to preempt tomorrow’s protests, did Morsi mention the mob attack against the Shi‘a in Zawiyat Abu Musallem. In the face of this indifference, Reem Magued of ONTV`s Baladna Bilmasry turned the agenda on its head; she interrupted the president`s speech to host a Shi‘i victim of the attack. In the face of the rising tide of sectarianism, the government left behind it a gaping hole of inaction and complicity. It was the citizen journalists at Mosireen, the practitioners at the non-governmental organizations of EIPR and Human Rights Watch, and the private television broadcasters who stepped up.