Follow Us

Follow on Twitter    Follow on Facebook    YouTube Channel    Vimeo Channel    Tumblr    SoundCloud Channel    iPhone App    iPhone App

Jordan's Assault on Journalism

[ ["Freedom for journalist Suleiman al-Khalidi and no to the detention of journalists." Image from executive-magazine.com]

Free speech beaten by book and by bludgeon

Character assassination is a hot topic in Jordan these days as thousands of demonstrators, riding the winds of the "Arab Spring," call for reform and accuse government officials and business leaders of abuse of power and corruption. Asking judges to put critical journalists behind bars is also popular among a ruling class that feels threatened by the sudden surge in revelations pouring out on the street and from the media.

The government of Prime Minister Marouf al-Bikhit is doing its bit to stifle free speech in the name of fighting corruption. A draft amendment to a law setting up an anti-corruption agency would punish people who spread “unjustified” rumors about corruption that “lead to insulting the reputation or infringing upon the dignity” of another person, with at least six months in prison. Taher Odwan, the government spokesperson, resigned over the proposed amendment on June 21.

Rather than add new provisions criminalizing defamation, Jordan should cancel those already in its penal code that send peaceful critics to jail for “insulting” the king or government institutions. In May, Secretary General of the Political Development Ministry Malek Twal promised that a new media strategy would reform those provisions. The government adopted the strategy in June, but it strangely remains unpublished. Instead, Bikhit said he would refer alleged character assassins to the courts.

Bikhit made good on his promise in late May by yanking a criminal defamation case against a journalist, Alaa al-Fazza, from a civilian court and referring it to the military-dominated State Security Court (SSC). The SSC prosecutor promptly detained Fazza for “working to change the constitution by unlawful means,” an offense punishable by death, based on an article he published about a Facebook group that supports the reinstatement of former Crown Prince Hamza, King Abdullah’s half-brother, whom Abdullah replaced with his own son Hussein. Allegedly among its members were ten members of parliament and two former ministers, including Nabil al-Sharif, the former information minister who had brought the complaint against Fazza. Unlike Fazza, Sharif was not detained or investigated for suspected unconstitutional activities. Fazza is out on bail, but the case continues.

Fazza also incurred the wrath of police chief Husein al-Majali over an article that blamed him and the interior minister for allowing Khalid Shahin, a business tycoon convicted on corruption charges, to leave prison and the country for medical treatment abroad, never to return. The scandal cost the health and justice ministers their positions, and Majali filed a criminal complaint against Fazza for “spreading false rumors.” Fazza was spared in a general amnesty, but Majali in July filed a civil suit seeking 10,000 dinars [14,100 dollars] in damages for harming the police department’s reputation.

Yahya Sa’ud, a member of parliament with roots in the town of Tafileh, was so upset over a June 13 Agence France-Presse (AFP) report that Tafileh residents attacked the king’s convoy on a visit there that he led protests seeking to have AFP Amman bureau chief, Randa Habib, referred to the SSC; two days later, a mob ransacked the AFP offices, and witnesses put Sa’ud at the scene. A police car stationed nearby to protect Al Jazeera’s offices did not intervene.

Al Jazeera correspondents have also been the victims of physical and verbal attacks. Two correspondents’ cars were smashed in March, and a policeman assaulted the bureau chief, Yasir Abu Hilala, while he was covering a demonstration in Amman on July 15. An internal police report on the incident, in which police beat ten journalists and some protesters, stated that policemen “did not differentiate between protester and journalist” in their beatings “because of the angry commotion that took hold” of them following previous protests on March 25 in Amman and April 15 in Zarqa’, in which numerous policemen were injured.

The police report recommended referring the heavyhanded policemen to court, but Jordan has a dismal record in holding officials to account for violence. When police stood by while a pro-government gang attacked demonstrators in February, there was no investigation, a police spokesperson told Human Rights Watch. And police who failed to stop similar attacks on March 25 and then attacked protesters themselves also faced no charges. Sa’ud faces no charges and is free to launch new attacks on AFP.

Jordan is attacking free speech, both by pursuing journalists under draconian laws and by failing to hold police accountable when they stand by doing nothing — or even join in — when journalists are attacked.

[This article first appeared in Executive Magazine.]

3 comments for "Jordan's Assault on Journalism"

Gravatar

Freedom is still in labor.. I'm sure freedom of speech will see the light soon.... Very soon

Dima Subeih wrote on August 05, 2011 at 08:48 AM
Gravatar

Sorry I disagree. Freedom of speach doesn't mean spreading rumors or lies. A journalist or a reporter should not Report and demonstrate at the same time. Ours are lacking the professionalism and can't be objective it can't work. Randa habib reports wrong stuff with lack of evidence. Abu hlaleh threatens to put Amman in fire. We lack professional reporters. When we have them then will talk about Freedom of speach.

deema wrote on August 05, 2011 at 08:55 AM
Gravatar

deema, let's assume that all Jordanian journalists are lacking professionalism like you say. Which is an outrageous claim given its level of generalization. But ok, let's assume that is the case. Does that mean they should be sent to the State Security Court, imprisoned, and so on? There are plenty of incidents in other countries where journalists who conduct themselves unprofessionally are asked to resign, issue an apology, or pay a fine after being processed by a civilian court. Really? You are ok with them being tried by security/military court? You don't think that such extremes are about something more than a lack of professionalism, like maybe authoritarianism, censorship, repression?

Your argument about freedom of speech is like other status quo supporters' arguments about democracy: Jordan is not ready for it, so until it is, there should be authoritarianism. And who will decide when they are ready? The rulers that stand to lose the most from actual freedom of speech? Or people like you who have self-appointed themselves arbitrators of who deserves certain rights and who does not? Free speech, like all other democratic rights, are fundamental and not contingent on being "ready for" or "deserving of." You sound like colonialists (you remember the British and French governments that ruled the different Arab states after WWI?) when they used to argue that the "natives" (that's people like you and me) were not ready for self-rule and therefore should continue to live under a colonial regime and be denied independence. You, intentionally or not, are making the same argument. You are basically saying that journalists/people are not read for freedom of speech (and presumably other democratic rights) and therefore should continue to be denied those rights.

Come on. You really can't be so ideological or naive to claim that all journalists are unprofessional? Is every journalist that is imprisoned in Jordan detained because of unprofessionalism? You don't think that there are journalists that have been arrested for the simple fact that they criticized the government or the king? If that is the case, then how about some freedom of speech so that all those great Jordanian journalists that are working outside of Jordan have a reason to come back and work in Jordan. Maybe, if there really are not professional journalists in Jordan, it because professional Jordanian journalists feel like they can only have a meaningful job outside of the country because, currently, if they work inside of Jordan they can't report on anything critical without threat of imprisonment.

tired of excuses wrote on August 06, 2011 at 11:31 AM

If you prefer, email your comments to info@jadaliyya.com.

Jad Navigation

View Full Map, Topics, and Countries »
You need to upgrade your Flash Player

Top Jadaliyya Tags

Get Adobe Flash player

Noteworthy

Arab Studies Journal NEW MERIP SITE AFD Call for Reviews

Jadaliyya Features

Pages/Sections

Archive