'The Right Not to Be a Perpetrator': In Support of BDS

Logo of the MLA Members for Justice in Palestine Logo of the MLA Members for Justice in Palestine

'The Right Not to Be a Perpetrator': In Support of BDS

By : Ariella Aïsha Azoulay أريئيلا أزولاي

[The following is an extract from an essay in the forthcoming anthology Assuming Boycott: Resistance, Agency, and Cultural Production (eds. Kareem Estefan, Carin Kuoni, Laura Raicovich: OR Books, 2017). The Modern Language Association (MLA) will be voting on a resolution calling for a boycott of Israeli academic institutions at its upcoming convention, to be held 5-8 January 2017 in Philadelphia.]

The Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement is a way to achieve three things: (1) to expose the mechanisms of dispossession, segregation, and legalized discrimination against Palestinians that are part of the Israeli democratic regime; (2) to publicly and internationally express solidarity with the Palestinians as a people, confronting the Israeli regime’s continuous efforts to fragment them into groups that are governed differentially within and beyond the green line; and (3) to mount pressure capable of impacting daily life for the privileged group of the governed population, i.e., Jewish Israelis, in order to radically alter the conduct of the Israeli regime or transform it altogether. A call for boycott is based on the assumption that sovereign states are actors in an international arena, and hence individuals, groups, institutions, and states can suspend their interactions with particular regimes until the justice of certain demands are recognized and adequately addressed. The Palestinian-led BDS movement thus aims to mobilize the international community to respond to a triple call from within that advocates: full equality for Palestinian citizens of Israel, an end to the military occupation of the Palestinian territories, and the right of Palestinians who were expelled in 1948 to return to their homes.

The boycott targets the Israeli regime, not Israeli citizens, unless they act as representatives of the regime. What, then, is the position of Jewish Israeli citizens with regard to this call? They may not be able to suspend their relations with the state completely, as BDS leaders themselves acknowledge. However, they can narrow them down. Occasionally, when they are able to mobilize certain symbolic power, they can publicly boycott particular events, prizes, and ceremonies, and avoid giving services that they are required to give. In this sense, their responses to the crimes and abuses practiced by their own regime do not come from an external position and hence do not consist of solidarity of the sort offered by citizens of other countries. Jewish Israelis are governed alongside Palestinians, and they are subjects of the same political regime; their citizenship is not external or incidental to the abuses of Palestinians under this regime, but its constitutive element. Unable to endorse the boycott from the outside, Jewish Israelis can still take part in it, and their participation, as citizens denouncing their own political regime, makes the BDS movement’s call a call to redefine the nature of their citizenship altogether.

Under the emergency regulations that have not been revoked since 1948, and whose purpose has been to maintain the principle of differential ruling, to be a good citizen means being involved, in more or less direct ways, more or less enthusiastically, in exercising the violence necessary to maintain this principle. Therefore, from the point of view of an Israeli citizen, the call for boycott can also be the beginning of the recognition of a right that Israeli Jews have been consistently deprived: the right not to be perpetrators.

The crimes that justify the boycott of Israel, crimes perpetrated against the Palestinians, are not just crimes against Palestinians but, to use Hannah Arendt’s expression, crimes against humanity.  Stopping crimes against humanity should not remain the interest of Palestinians alone. These should be, first and foremost, the obligations and interests of Israeli Jews and the Jewish community worldwide, of all those who were implicated in committing and perpetuating these crimes, all those who—by collaborating with the political regimes that have ordered the crimes, refused to acknowledge them, and spread misinformation about them—have been deprived of their inalienable right not to be perpetrators.

In a decades-long process, the Israeli regime has succeeded in making it almost impossible either to imagine civil life in Israel-Palestine or to recognize the common history of Jews and Palestinians as a point of departure for any process of Palestinian reparation. The engaging call of the BDS movement—“Let us harness solidarity into forms of action that can end international support for Israel’s crimes”—should be understood as addressed to the international community. Israelis cannot allow themselves the luxury of solidarity, as if the struggle to overthrow the Israeli regime and the history of almost seven decades of regime-made disaster is a Palestinian cause they support from the outside. Israeli Jews should engage in the BDS movement’s call, but they should also do much more. It is their duty to start imagining new forms of partnership devoid of any claim for Jewish supremacy. 

[This post was originally published on the website of MLA Members for Justice in Palestine.]

  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • Ariella Aïsha Azoulay, The Jewelers of the Ummah: A Potential History of the Jewish Muslim World (New Texts Out Now)

      Ariella Aïsha Azoulay, The Jewelers of the Ummah: A Potential History of the Jewish Muslim World (New Texts Out Now)

      There were two interrelated things which drove me to write this book: first, the clear understanding I had in 2012, in the wake of my father’s death, that two colonial projects deracinated me from the world of my ancestors, the Jewish Muslim world, and the Maghreb in particular, of which I knew very little; second, the realizations I subsequently came to that, firstly, it was not a coincidence that I was ignorant of this world for so long, and, secondly, though I was immersed in researching different places that were destroyed by imperial enterprises, studying the world of my ancestors did not seem relevant, despite the fact that it was destroyed with the same types of violence I had been examining.

    • The Ruins Should Be Inhabited as Part of Process of Repair

      The Ruins Should Be Inhabited as Part of Process of Repair

      Whoever speaks about the question of Palestine
      should start by saying who they are,
      how they are impacted by the question of Palestine
      or how they have been implicated to hold Palestine as an imperial question,
      for which, by definition, only imperial solutions could be given.
      Often, the struggle of colonized people is also a struggle against
      the imperial violence that turned them or their place
      into such a question to be solved, or a struggle against the violence that
      forced them to embody the imperial solution to that question. 

    • اليهود الجزائريون لم ينسوا جرائم فرنسا الاستعماريّة

      اليهود الجزائريون لم ينسوا جرائم فرنسا الاستعماريّة

      بعد اعتراف الرئيس الفرنسي إيمانيول ماكرون أن استعمار الجزائر كان جريمة ضد الإنسانيّة، كلّف المؤرخ الفرنسي بنيامين ستورا بمراجعة هذا الإرث التاريخي. في هذه الرسالة، تخاطب الكاتبة المؤرخ وتقف على أبرز النقاط التي أغفلها تقريره، مثل الجرائم التي ارتكبها الاستعمار الفرنسي ضد الإنسانية، والجرائم التي تهاجم التنوّع الإنساني، وتنوّع صيغ العيش، في الجزائر والمغرب الكبير عمومًا.

The MLA and the Boycott of Israeli Academic Institutions

The Modern Language Association (MLA) will be voting on a resolution calling for a boycott of Israeli academic institutions at its upcoming convention, to be held 5-8 January 2017 in Philadelphia. This short documentary makes the case for MLA members to vote in support of the resolution. The video includes interviews with numerous prominent literary scholars who support the boycott resolution. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, W. J. T. Mitchell, Bruce Robbins, Margaret Ferguson, Rosaura Sanchez, David Lloyd, Malini Schueller, David Palumbo Liu, Jeffery Sacks, Koritha Mitchell, Kenneth Surin, and Kamran Rastegar are among the scholars interviewed. The interviews were conducted at the 2016 MLA Convention in Austin, Texas. For more information, see the website of the MLA Members for Justice in Palestine.

The MLA and the Boycott of Israeli Academic Institutions from MLAMJP video on Vimeo.