Follow Us

Follow on Twitter    Follow on Facebook    YouTube Channel    Vimeo Channel    Tumblr    SoundCloud Channel    iPhone App    iPhone App

Yemen's Turn: An Overview

[Poster of Ali Abdullah Saleh. Arabic text reads [Poster of Ali Abdullah Saleh. Arabic text reads "leave" and "wanted for justice." Image from]

To begin to understand the trajectory of recent political developments in Yemen, it is necessary to cast one’s eye back further than the heady days of 2011. Undoubtedly, events in Egypt and Tunisia have lent considerable force to demonstrations in the capital, Sana’a. However, it would be unfair to the thousands of Yemenis who for years have organized daily protests throughout the country and the thousands who have been killed, imprisoned, injured and tortured by the state to say that the widespread popular organizing against the regime of `Ali `Abdullah Salih had its genesis anywhere but Yemen.

There have been street protests throughout Yemen, and especially in the south, since 2007. While the southern protesters are now demanding secession, their initial demands included grievances similar to those articulated in Egypt and Tunisia, including complaints of unemployment, increasing economic destitution, as well as political repression and underrepresentation. It was unsurprising that the grievances articulated by the southern protesters became anti-northern and secessionist in nature. A majority of Yemen’s resources flow from oil fields, fisheries, and ports in the south into the coffers of the national government that largely favors infrastructure projects and government patrons based in Sana’a. Eager to isolate southern grievances from similar rumblings in the north, the government framed the southern protests as a regional nationalistic agitation held over from 1994, when the former north and south Yemen states fought a post-unification civil war. The government’s efforts were successful as southern grievances slowly evolved into calls for secession and popular northern reaction was anger and defensiveness against the southerners who came to be perceived as people who sought to destroy national unity and who “have wanted to secede since 1990.”

While there have been sporadic protests throughout the north (and a rebellion north of Sana’a that has been ongoing for almost a decade), it was the protests in Tunisia and then Egypt that triggered the larger and more persistent protests in Sana’a and Taiz (the second largest city in the north), which have been primarily organized by university students and other middle class activists. The protests in Sana’a overtly seek to learn from and replicate the protests in Egypt, including calling themselves “the youth movement”, the use of slogans (“the people want the fall of the regime,”), the emphasis on peaceful protests, setting up a public projector screen to broadcast Al-Jazeera (in Taiz) and the use of Twitter, Facebook, Youtube and other sites to publicize protester actions and government responses.

This article is now featured in Jadaliyya's edited volume entitled Dawn of the Arab Uprisings: End of An Old Order? (Pluto Press, 2012). The volume documents the first six months of the Arab uprisings, explaining the backgrounds and trajectories of these popular movements. It also archives the range of responses that emanated from activists, scholars, and analysts as they sought to make sense of the rapidly unfolding events. Click here to access the full article by ordering your copy of Dawn of the Arab Uprisings from Amazon, or use the link below to purchase from the publisher.

Latest posts in Libya-Yemen:

8 comments for "Yemen's Turn: An Overview"


Great writing Lara, however I must disagree on the notion of Husain Al-Ahmar intending to "protect" the demonstrators. Historically, the northern tribes make a living of conquering each other and to them Sanaa is a hot cake. Nobody expects that they will do any good. In fact, the Ahmar brothers are clearing staging to take over Salih's regime and they could never be a better option for Yemen. Cheers..

Adnan wrote on February 20, 2011 at 03:48 PM

Thanks Lara for this very informative peice.

Maya wrote on February 20, 2011 at 11:21 PM

I agree that Al-Ahmar brothers can use (and have used) their power in a dangerous and divisive way. Regardless of whether Al-Ahmar and their people will "protect" the protesters as Hussein promised, or whether their alignment with the protesters has a positive or negative effect on the movement, the choice to position themselves against Saleh I think will have significant implications for Saleh's ability to hold power.

Lara wrote on February 21, 2011 at 10:05 AM

Wonderful Lara........thank you.

Tom wrote on February 21, 2011 at 07:42 PM

Great article, Lara. Thank you.

Yahya wrote on February 21, 2011 at 07:52 PM

Really an eye opener for me Lara - thank you, so informative

James wrote on February 21, 2011 at 09:30 PM

Great summary. Thank you!

Henry wrote on February 23, 2011 at 03:48 PM

Your writing is interesting and informative. Thanks for your effort!

Lori Hamilton wrote on March 08, 2011 at 09:44 AM

If you prefer, email your comments to




Apply for an ASI Internship now!


Political Economy Project

Issues a

Call for Letters of Interest


Jadaliyya Launches its

Political Economy




F O R    T H E    C L A S S R O O M 

Critical Readings in Political Economy: 1967


The 1967 Defeat and the Conditions of the Now: A Roundtable


E N G A G E M E N T