From the Editors
Jadaliyya launches its new Syria page . . . Click here.
The Culture Page Returns . . . . click here
Want to find out about new books? Visit our expanding NEWTON page. Click here.
Call for Photos: Become a Contributing Photographer at Jadaliyya
Internship Opportunities at ASI (Jadaliyya, Arab Studies Journal, FAMA). Click here!
The Jadaliyya Egypt Elections Watch page archives! Click here for comprehensive coverage.
Egypt Election Results: Of 427 seats settled, MB got 193, Nour 108, Wafd 38, Bloc 30, RDP 11, Rev. Cont. 10, Wasat 8 (Click Here)
Interested in writing a Review for Jadaliyya? Visit our Call for Reviews here.
It's Official: In 2006, The Lebanese Government Was Hoping Israel Would Disarm Hezbollah For them
[Lebanon, August 2006. Moments after an Israeli air strike destroyed buildings in Dahieh: Image by Paolo Pellegrin]
So now we know. In 2006, as Israel was bombing Lebanese highways, power supplies, the airport, and oil reservoirs, the Lebanese Prime Minister was hoping that Israel would finish “the job” quickly and successfully. Now we know. As over a quarter of the population was displaced from their homes under the threat of missiles, tank fire and artillery, the then commander of the army and now president of Lebanon, was letting the Israeli government know that the Lebanese army would stand down. As 10,000 homes were destroyed and over 1,300 Lebanese citizens (1/3 of them children) were killed, the Lebanese government's main concern was that that this very real and very brutal Israeli re-invasion might lead to a “reoccupation” of Lebanon by Syria.
The recent publication of a new spate of wikileaks cables in the Lebanese daily newspaper Al-Akhbar is bound to electrify the already on-edge political standoff in Lebanon. As Najib Mikati continues to try to form a government, the March 14th coalition continues to escalate their demands that Hezbollah disarm, and the publication of the indictments in the Special Tribunal for Lebanon continue to loom on the horizon, these leaked diplomatic cables will either push the country over the edge or, more likely, add another layer to the cynicism, apathy and exhaustion that forms like scar tissue on the surface of the Lebanese body public.
The day after the attacks on Lebanon began, Prime Minister Sinioura described the Israeli bombardment of the airport, highways, and civilian areas as "disproportionate" and "unhelpful.” Reading the cables, it becomes clear that what Sinioura meant was that Israeli military actions were unhelpful to what was the common goal of the Israeli government and Lebanese government; the disarmament of Hezbollah, the neutralization of its power in Lebanon, and the end of the armed resistance in Lebanon to continued Israeli occupation. In 2006, with friends and family, we would have these debates-particularly in the first weeks of the war. Was our government tacitly accepting Israeli actions against us? Had our government drawn some arbitrary red line (around Beirut and “Christian areas”, as another wikileaks cable confirmed) that left the entirety of South Lebanon and over a million Lebanese civilians exposed to the machinations of the Israeli war machine? I remember reading with nausea a statement issued from the Israeli government “reassuring” the [“moderate”] Lebanese that “Israel is not fighting Lebanon but the terrorist element there, led by Nasrallah and his cohorts, who have made Lebanon a hostage and created Syrian- and Iranian-sponsored terrorist enclaves of murder." Two weeks into the war, clearly now realizing that Hezbollah would not fold under Israeli attack like a deck of cards and also realizing that the majority of Lebanese citizens rejected Israel's “help”, Sinioura told the American Ambassador that “both GOI [government of Israel] and GOL [government of Lebanon] were getting tied up in "details" and risked losing the main objective -- peace and security for Israel, and peace and a disarmed Hezbollah for Lebanon. Sinioura argued that only the Iranian and Syrian regimes benefited from bickering over the proposed cease-fire agreement and its related UNSC resolution.” Clearly more in fear of a possible Syrian retrenchment in Lebanon, Sinioura complained to the American Ambassador that Israel's air and sea blockade of Lebanon, was "pushing us all into the arms of Syria." As thousands of Lebanese civilians escaped to, and were welcomed by, Syria, and as food and relief aid was streaming into Lebanon from Syria (the only country other Israel that Lebanon shares a border with), Sinioura was complaining that the true cost of Israel's land, air and sea blockade of Lebanon was that “Syria is becoming our lungs, we can only breathe through the Syrians."
Unfortunately for all Lebanese citizens and all residents of Lebanon (including over 400,000 Palestinian refugees, 150,000 Kurdish refugees, and some 100,000 foreign indentured housekeepers) the post 2006 Lebanese government did not change course. According to another 2008 wikileaks cable, Minister of Defense Elias al Murr told the American Ambassador to Lebanon that in the possibility of yet another Israel-Lebanon war, Israel must respect what he considered to be two read lines "One, it must not touch the Blue Line or the UNSCR 1701 areas as this will keep Hezbollah out of these areas...Two, Israel cannot bomb bridges and infrastructure in the Christian areas." Effectively, two years after the end of the war, the Lebanese Minister of Defense was giving military advice to the Israeli government and trying to keep only certain areas and populations of Lebanon safe from the Israeli war machine. This week, Saad al Hariri stripped off his jacket, rolled up his sleeves in front of a delirious crowd of supporters and again reiterated the demand that Hezbollah disarm and that the population was divided between "those" who are democratic and "those" that support the March 8 coalition and more specifically, Hezbollah.
----
One night in 2006, I was standing on my balcony in West Beirut after a day of running between centers for the displaced distributing much needed goods and, just as importantly, just sitting and talking with people who were now refugees in our shared country. I was watching Israeli bombardment light up the sky. On a profound, and almost inexplicable level, I was not afraid. I knew that I was not their target. I also knew that my relative safety was bought at the direct expense of my co-citizens through the currency of political sectarianism, which engendered the logic that to destroy Hezbollah, one had to destroy and displace its potential voters. Simply put, Shiite majority areas were bombed indiscriminately because, in the logic of sectarianism, they were the potential supporters of Hezbollah, a Shiite paramilitary political party. I felt helpless that night, I knew that in the moment I could do nothing about the way that violence is distributed across sectarian and economic groups unevenly. Even more so, I realized again that I was not in control of my identity, that even if I was an atheist in solidarity with Hezbollah I was “read” by the Israeli war machine, the international community, and even the Sinioura government as a “Sunni Beiruti” and that it was this metaphysically violent reading that was keeping me safe from the direct violenceof yet another war. I knew that my neighborhood would not be flattened (and that its flattening would not be internationally sanctioned) in order to destroy possible Hezbollah hiding places, that my neighbors and family would not be forced to flee under fire from their homes and cram into makeshift displacement centers 30 to a room, and I knewthat less than one kilometer away my co-citizens were paying the price of being “read” differently by that same Israeli war machine, international community, and Sinioura government. In the thirty years that I have been alive, I have lived through several wars in Lebanon. But I have never felt so implicated in the violence wrought upon others. I felt this viscerally and yet I did not have the words to explain these feelings of guilt because my relative safety was being bought and sold at such a high price. I did not have the evidence.
Now I do.
10 comments for "It's Official: In 2006, The Lebanese Government Was Hoping Israel Would Disarm Hezbollah For them "
Very well put Maya. The luxury those of us living in 'non-shiite' areas 'enjoyed' during the 2006 war was disgusting. Your honesty is refreshingly painful and should be contagious. I salute you.
Your azrticle is soooo biased and do not take all the facts on the ground. If Elias El Murr wants to protect what is left from Lebanon in an event of an israeli attack, I do not see where is the harm in that. On the other hand, does Hizbollah allow non shiites to join the resistance? I guess not.
thank you
@Andre. I'm not even sure that your comment warrants a response, but I guess I will make a few comments.
1- Elias al Murr was quite clear what areas he wanted to protect; and they were CHRISTIAN areas. That a Minister of Defense (a NATIONAL post) would be speaking only of one religion rather than the entire country is not surprising in Lebanon, but it is still nauseating and should be exposed for what it is; an uneven weighting of Lebanese citizens.
As for Hezbollah and the resistance, what does your point imply? Do you mean that because Hezbollah does not allow non-Shiites to join the resistance (militarily, I might add) that therefore it is permissible for Israel (and for the Lebanese government) to "decide" that in order to "uproot" Hezbollah, the majority of Shiite Lebanese need to be bombed and physically displaced? Is this what you intended to mean by your comment?
andree, wake up!
It is quite sad that Lebanon's leaders aren't powerful enough to disband an armed force that has intimidated everyone in Lebanon and that they end up hoping Israel's aggression does the work for them. The problem isn't with the politicians but with the weakness of the system that allows an armed militia to maintain weapons alongside Lebanon's army. Weber's definition of a state (monopoly on violence) does not hold for Lebanon. This is a joke. The Lebanese army is much weaker than Hezbullah, which can get away with everything, even the murder of a Prime Minister.
@Elizabeth,
The reasons for Hezbollah's presence and strength in Lebanon are numerous, but perhaps the most important one is the brutal Israeli occupation that South Lebanon lived under for over twenty years and the daily violations of Lebanese sovereignty since 1978. Furthermore, the fact that the Lebanese state effectively gave up on the south (or never really invested) allowed for several parties over the years to do the work of defending Lebanon's borders and population--- thus garnering support, trust and legitimacy that far outstrips that of the state. I find the Weberian definition of a state lacking in that it empahsizes (military)force at the expense of governmentality. Finally, the jury is out who assassinated PM Hariri. Lets not use our assumptions to promote other political goals regarding Lebanon's future.
In response to Elizabeth's comment: The way in which Elizabeth describes Hezbollah is not based on fact. Hezbollah does not actually go about intimidating everyone in Lebanon. It is Islamic, it is political but it did come into existence as a resistance movement. And it is a very successful and inteligent resistance movement. Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon ten years ago was primarily due to Hezbollah. Israel's invasion of 2006 was brought to a standstill by Hezbollah. Criticising Hezbollah makes as much sense as criticising the French resistance for standing up to the Germans during World War 2.
one of the most interesting articles I have lately read, thanks Maya
It is a shame Israel did not finish off Iran's puppet in that war. But I can reassure all here, that when the next war comes, Israel will make sure that all those supporting Hezbollah will regret they ever sided with them. It is also noteworthy here, how those Lebanese who do not support Hassan and his henchmen, and there are many!! Are relegated in this article. The fact that nearly half of the population wishes Hassan dead surely needs mentioning here. But when Iran goes down the drain, so will this band of Islamofascists.
Hot on Facebook
“These rituals have been institutionalized in the political system and have become part of the political discourse in Morocco.”click me | أنقرني email quote to a friend
From Jadaliyya Reports
Jadalicious / جدلشس
Twitter Updates
Latest Entries
View All Entries »- لا شيء يفنى أو يُخلق من عدم
- It Is What It Is
- New Texts Out Now: Betty S. Anderson, The American University of Beirut: Arab Nationalism and Liberal Education
- Plundering the Past: Scholarly Treasures
- A Year After: The February 20 Protest Movement in Morocco
- حين يكون الكوكب بأسره ضد الثورة
- The Real Me and the Hypothetical Syrian Revolution - Part 1
- Searching for the Arab Spring in Ramallah
- Remembering Anthony Shadid
- Saving Khader Adnan's Life Saves Our Own Soul
- نداء الأسير خضـر عدنـان إلى العالم
- الإخوان في البرلمان؛ محاولة للفهم
- "Violating Sacred Values" in Morocco: Free Speech with an Exception
- Our Friend Anthony Shadid's Stories
- Statement on Hunger Strike of Khader Adnan by Palestinian Human Rights Organizations
- Struggles That Fueled a Revolution
- Immunity, Accountability, and the Arab Uprisings: Jadaliyya Co-Editor Noura Erakat Discusses the Role of the Human Rights Community
- Anthony Shadid Is No Longer with Us
- Patent for an Invented People
- The Insha'at Exodus















Awesome Article, my Lebanese compatriot.