Reclaiming Freedom for the Left: Themed Panel Series at 2012 Left Forum (16-18 March, New York City)

[Image from website for Left Forum [Image from website for Left Forum

Reclaiming Freedom for the Left: Themed Panel Series at 2012 Left Forum (16-18 March, New York City)

By : Jadaliyya Reports

The 2012 Left Forum will be held this month, on 16-18 March at Pace University in New York City. This year`s conference is being organized under the theme, "Occupy the System: Confronting Global Capitalism" (see complete program here).

The three panels below are grouped around the theme of "reclaiming freedom for the left" and analyze the capture of the discursive trope of freedom by the right in three areas: the economy; ideologies of "meritocracy"; and international interventionism. The last of the below three panels is explicitly about the Middle East and intervention.

Freedom and The Economy: Democratize or Destroy?

Saturday: 10am-11:10am
Room: W520

How does the Left envision freedom in the economic sphere? The mainstream Left has struggled to formulate a systematic response to the economic crisis. Against the mainstream push for austerity, the Left has defended progressive taxation, campaign finance reform, and a jobs program. The focus on these piecemeal, defensive goals points to confusion and uncertainty as to the deeper aims of economic order, and to the narrowing of intellectual horizons. The “Occupy Movement” suggests an opportunity to broaden this debate, offering a heterogeneous array of criticisms against the Fed, the top 1%, corporations, and debt. Yet, in general, the most critical attitude is more focused on destroying than democratizing, smashing rather than socializing. The path to freedom appears, in the mood of some of the Occupy Movement, to be about getting rid of or eliminating, rather than appropriating and transforming, the economic practices and entities that rule our lives. This panel will explore an alternative avenue for the Left – to develop a systematic view of economic questions that begins by addressing the impact on human freedom. There is a great deal of potential to escape the kinds of discipline and domination to which most people are subject, while capturing the benefits of national organization, planning and distribution established through the current economic order.

Chair:

  • Danya Reda

Participants:

  • Alex Gourevitch
  • Corey Robin
  • Doug Henwood


Meritocracy and the Ideology of Freedom

Saturday: 12pm-1:50pm
Room: W520

The invocation of freedom remains routine in American politics. But how is freedom defined in contemporary politics, and who defines its meaning? This panel will focus on the ideology of meritocracy as the dominant conception of freedom in America today. The panel will discuss whether and how the ‘meritocratic’ ideology, and the emphasis on legal justice and access to higher education that it entails, has absorbed the energies of the left in a fundamentally anti-utopian project. In particular, it will show how a significant amount of left-wing energy has been absorbed into using courts to enforce meritocratic ‘equal opportunity’ and address the ways in which the ‘rights revolution’ has and has not expanded actual freedom for the majority of Americans. The panel will address the way the limits of the rights revolution is connected to the underlying inegalitarian vision of meritocratic freedom, which presupposes a competitive struggle among the majority to use their ‘equal opportunity’ to win access to deeply unequal positions of social and political power. Understanding the ideas and institutions of meritocracy, and its elite conception of freedom, can help us rethink the way we structure certain basic institutions like the law and public education.

Chair:

  • Alex Gourevitch

Panelists:

  • Aziz Rana
  • Danya Reda
  • Nick Frayn


Freedom and International Affairs

Saturday: 3pm-4:50pm
Room: W520

The ‘traditional’ left-wing position on international affairs revolved around two principles: internationalism and self-determination. The current left-wing position is defined by a generic anti-imperialism and a defense of global civil society. It is not clear that these current positions either diagnose the most serious threats to freedom globally (i.e. ‘empire’) nor present the most attractive alternative (global civil society). The purpose of this panel is to think through what it means to defend freedom in international affairs today by reflecting on the prevailing position in light of ‘traditional’ left-wing internationalism. The concern is that ‘global civil society,’ while helpfully asserting the very broad idea of cosmopolitan human solidarity, is ultimately apolitical, eschewing the quest for power itself. It undermines internationalism and self-determination, and thus, in our view, a vision of international affairs that links up with the quest for human emancipation. These concerns will be addressed concretely in two ways: 1) by exploring how the left should conceptualize and critique recent U.S. interventionist practices (such as in Libya); and 2) by addressing the role and political purpose of cross-national solidarities with respect to local democratic movements.

Chair:

  • Nick Frayn

Panelists:

  • Aziz Rana
  • Darryl Li
  • Asli Bali

 

  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 8: Resigning the State Department Over Gaza With Hala Rharrit

      Long Form Podcast Episode 8: Resigning the State Department Over Gaza With Hala Rharrit

      In this episode of Long Form, Hala Rharrit discusses the factors that led her to resign from the US State Department, the mechanisms by which institutional corruption and ideological commitments of officials and representatives ensure US support for Israel, and how US decision-makers consistently violate international law and US laws/legislation. Rharrit also addresses the Trump administration’s claim that South Africa is perpetrating genocide against the country’s Afrikaaner population, and how this intersects with the US-Israeli campaign of retribution against South Africa for hauling Israel before the ICJ on charges of genocide.

    • Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      The entire globe stands behind Israel as it faces its most intractable existential crisis since it started its slow-motion Genocide in 1948. People of conscience the world over are in tears as Israel has completely run out of morals and laws to violate during its current faster-paced Genocide in Gaza. Israelis, state and society, feel helpless, like sitting ducks, as they search and scramble for an inkling of hope that they might find one more human value to desecrate, but, alas, their efforts remain futile. They have covered their grounds impeccably and now have to face the music. This is an emergency call for immediate global solidarity with Israel’s quest far a lot more annihilation. Please lend a helping limb.

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 7: Think Tanks and Manufactuing Consent with Mandy Turner (4 June)

      Long Form Podcast Episode 7: Think Tanks and Manufactuing Consent with Mandy Turner (4 June)

      In this episode, Mandy Turner discusses the vital role think tanks play in the policy process, and in manufacturing consent for government policy. Turner recently published a landmark study of leading Western think tanks and their positions on Israel and Palestine, tracing pronounced pro-Israel bias, where the the key role is primarily the work of senior staff within these institutions, the so-called “gatekeepers.”

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412