Without Principle, There is Nothing: On the Undignified Politics of the American Task Force on Palestine

New Article Submission

Thank you for your interest in Jadaliyya. We welcome all submissions. The most significant requirement is for Jadaliyya submissions to be analytically compelling and offer a perspective or argument that has not been covered at length either on Jadaliyya or elsewhere. Because of the volume of submissions, well-written pieces are prioritized. Length is flexible, 1000 to 2500 words is the average range. However, we will accept longer pieces. Once submitted, several members of the editorial committee will review your piece and one of them will inform you of the decision.
Author Details
Article Details
Select Countries
Select Keywords
Select Topics
Only RTF, Word, and Pages documents accepted.

Recommended image size: 762x800 px

Location of each image should be indicated in the text of the article via a square bracket caption that includes: (1) a description of the image; (2) the photographer/designer and source of the image. Please note we only use images you as the author have the right to use, which usually means those of your own creation or those published under Creative Commons. Alternatively, you need specific permission from the copyright holder.
Please read the Release Form and provide an electronic signature [your full name] below to confirm that you accept its terms
Required
Hyperlink words in your article if they refer to links on the internet. We encourage more, rather than less, links (try to avoid footnotes—embed them as hyperlinks if possible)

Article added successfully.

Pages Menu BETA
May 20, 2012 Israel
[Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren and President of the American Task Force on Palestine Ziad Asali at “Independence Day” celebration organized by the Israeli Embassy in Washington, DC. Image by Natasha Mosgovaya] [Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren and President of the American Task Force on Palestine Ziad Asali at “Independence Day” celebration organized by the Israeli Embassy in Washington, DC. Image by Natasha Mosgovaya]

Without Principle, There is Nothing: On the Undignified Politics of the American Task Force on Palestine

By : Jadaliyya Reports

[The following statement was issued by the US Palestinian Community Network  on 19 May 2012 in response to the event of and ensuing discussion around the participation ATFP`s Ziad Asali in an Israeli "Independence Day" celebration.]

Across the shatat and in the homeland, Palestinians marked the 64th anniversary of the Nakba of 1948 in a multitude of ways. We rallied, we held vigils, and we took a quiet moment to remember, reflect, and mourn. On this anniversary, we particularly honored our heroes in Israeli prisons, who conducted the longest, and one of the largest, hunger strikes in history. In our long march to liberation and return, it has always been our people, their undiminished courage, and their towering fortitude, that have carried our struggle through. We are honored to be Palestinian, proud of our people, and the nobility of our cause.

It is therefore with grave concern that we issue this letter expressing our dismay at the continued disregard and disrespect for our struggle and our people by the American Task Force on Palestine (ATFP), and its President, Ziad Asali.

At this time of remembrance, two photos were widely circulated of Asali embracing Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren at a celebration of Israel’s independence hosted by the Israeli embassy in Washington, DC. While Palestinians were mourning the destruction of 531 of our villages, and the expulsion of nearly 800,000 of our people, Asali saw fit to attend a celebration of that moment, and shake the hands of a man whose task it is to silence us and defend the destruction of our homes, theft of our land, starvation of our prisoners, and elimination of our people.

Indeed, this incident is merely the culmination of a long history of ATFP’s betrayal of our people. Since its inception in 2003, with Asali as its President, ATFP has consistently found itself the focus of the Palestinian community’s ire, and the organization’s history carries a string of resignations by one Board member after another in disgust. In the wake of Israel’s 2008-2009 war on Gaza, several Board members stepped down in protest of ATFP comments to CNN effectively absolving Israel of responsibility for its crimes.  In his resignation letter to the Board, one member wrote:

[Asali’s] comments and the direction he is taking ATFP do not advance the cause for justice in Palestine and do not foster unity among the Palestinian people.  In fact, ATFP’s direction is in line with the American administration’s or institution’s misguided and unjust policy. [1]

Another argued:

This is not the first time that ATFP fails to take a strong and clear stand to protect and support the [Palestinians] against Israeli aggression and illegal occupation. I was disappointed then and raised my objections to many members of the Board including the President.

Today’s inappropriate, ineffective and weak ATFP statement was the last straw. ATFP should be representing and advocating for the just Palestinian cause rather than blaming the victim and giving excuses for Israel’s continued occupation and devastation of the Palestinian people. ATFP over time has become nothing more than a mouthpiece for the current Administration’s position on Palestine as opposed to attempting to impact policy changes through communicating the true suffering and devastation from Israeli policies that are supported by the US. We must demonstrate to the US government that its unconditional support of Israel violates American notions of justice, equity and liberty. American interests are not served by such unconditional support. ATFP has failed to do that. ATFP has failed our community. [2]

More recently, in September 2011, another Board member resigned after Asali aligned with the U.S./Israel position on the Palestinian Authority statehood bid at the United Nations (UN).  In a statement explaining his resignation, this Board Member specifically cited “[t]he clear failure of the organization to take a position independent of the US government” and “[t]he fact that the organization – as stated by its president – appears to care more about the survival of the organization over everything else including the future of Palestine.”

In response to widespread community anger over the ATFP’s latest transgression, staff member Hussein Ibish wrote in defense of the organization, “[I]n terms of gaining a real measure of influence in the policy conversation in Washington, it has been an unprecedented and unexpected success.”  As evidence of this “real measure of influence in the policy conversation in Washington,” Ibish inexplicably cites “[a] 2009 letter from Rep. Howard L. Berman (D-CA), then Chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, attest[ing] that Asali and ATFP ‘have been an important influence on my own thinking about Middle East peacemaking and that of many of my colleagues in the Congress.’”

Representative Berman is among Israel’s staunchest allies in Congress. After praising Asali and the ATFP, Rep. Berman proceeded to vote in favor of Israel on every piece of one-sided legislation regarding the Jewish state before him. For example, during the 111th session of Congress (2009-2010), Rep. Berman voted “Yes” on H.Res 34 supporting Israel and placing exclusive blame for the Gaza massacres on Hamas, and “Yes” on H.Res 867 calling the Goldstone report “biased” and “unworthy of further consideration.”  Furthermore, Rep. Berman signed letters to President Obama stating that there should be no U.S. pressure on Israel, and defending Israel’s May 2010 lethal assault on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, when Israel killed eight Turkish and one American human rights activists. Rep. Berman also sponsored H.Res 2589 (the Anti-Boycott Act) in the House. This bill, which has not been passed, seeks to prohibit American individuals and organizations from actively boycotting Israeli goods.

Given his unwavering commitment to Israel in Congress, an endorsement from Rep. Berman is evidence not of “success” and “influence” in Washington, but rather of pandering complicity by the ATFP.  What the ATFP attempts to sell as a pragmatic or strategic exchange has in actuality amounted to nothing more than a one-sided arrow.  In this regard, rather than serving as a conduit through which Palestinian interests are advocated to the political establishment, the ATFP has conversely acted as a means through which Israel’s advocates in Congress push their agenda on Palestinian-Americans (or, in reality, the Board members and staff of the ATFP).

While it is every Palestinian’s prerogative to meet with whomever they please, it is unacceptable for any individual or organization to purport to represent our community without accountability or deference thereto. Although the ATFP may sometimes claim that its self-serving actions are in an individual capacity, this organization of a few individuals willingly embraces and exploits a perception of representation in Washington’s chambers of power in exchange for recognition and acceptance by the pro-Israeli political establishment.

We recognize that some Palestinians in the US may consider ATFP as performing the necessary task of speaking to power, or they may see it as a necessary evil by which the Palestinian people can gain a foothold in the seemingly impossible arena of political establishment. To them we offer a simple reminder: Without holding fast to the principles our struggle holds close, no amount of obsequious pandering to US and Israeli sensibilities will ever serve Palestinian national interests. In our long history of struggle, and in the history of anti-colonial movements the world over, this remains an undeniable fact.

Although many are calling for the dissolution of the ATFP, it should be understood that this organization is not the first, and may not be the last, of its kind. As long as there exists an oppressor, there will exist a demand for complicity from the oppressed and, sadly, willing participants offering to barter their identity in exchange for gain.

We call on members of the American Task Force on Palestine board to review the practices and policies of the ATFP, do what a sense of collective responsibility and national belonging necessitates and resign from their posts.

We call on all Palestinian associations, organizations, societies and formations and community members and activists to: 

  • Write to members of the ATFP board, calling on them to resign from their posts.
  • Refuse to provide platforms of any kind for any representatives of the American Task Force on Palestine, including its leadership and Board
  • Continue to actively participate in the continuing grassroots organizing for Palestine across the United States.

As we work towards rebuilding our national institutions to speak for Palestinians wherever they are, it is our task as Palestinians in the US to remain vigilant, and reject those who do not uphold our dignity and our principles as a people and as a struggle. As USPCN and the Palestinian community in Chicago stands with its allies in protest against NATO and global powers that target indigenous and popular struggles of self-determination, emancipation, and social and economic justice the world over, we remind each other that in organizing together, we bring power to our collective voice, and ensure that principle always triumphs over expedience.

We cannot but end by once again paying homage to the over 4,600 Palestinian political prisoners languishing in Israeli prisons; sacrificing self for the collective interest. We pay tribute to our wounded, our martyrs, and all the organizers around the world who quietly, brilliantly, selflessly, every day and in every way, hold fast to Palestine, and uphold the ideals of our struggle.

Until liberation and return.

US Palestinian Community Network

--------------------------------------
[1]  A. Awad, Letter to Board, January 11, 2009, in USPCN possession.
[2]  T. Barqawi, Letter to Board, December 28, 2008, in USPCN possession.
Tags

  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 8: Resigning the State Department Over Gaza With Hala Rharrit

      Long Form Podcast Episode 8: Resigning the State Department Over Gaza With Hala Rharrit

      In this episode of Long Form, Hala Rharrit discusses the factors that led her to resign from the US State Department, the mechanisms by which institutional corruption and ideological commitments of officials and representatives ensure US support for Israel, and how US decision-makers consistently violate international law and US laws/legislation. Rharrit also addresses the Trump administration’s claim that South Africa is perpetrating genocide against the country’s Afrikaaner population, and how this intersects with the US-Israeli campaign of retribution against South Africa for hauling Israel before the ICJ on charges of genocide.

    • Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      The entire globe stands behind Israel as it faces its most intractable existential crisis since it started its slow-motion Genocide in 1948. People of conscience the world over are in tears as Israel has completely run out of morals and laws to violate during its current faster-paced Genocide in Gaza. Israelis, state and society, feel helpless, like sitting ducks, as they search and scramble for an inkling of hope that they might find one more human value to desecrate, but, alas, their efforts remain futile. They have covered their grounds impeccably and now have to face the music. This is an emergency call for immediate global solidarity with Israel’s quest far a lot more annihilation. Please lend a helping limb.

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 7: Think Tanks and Manufactuing Consent with Mandy Turner (4 June)

      Long Form Podcast Episode 7: Think Tanks and Manufactuing Consent with Mandy Turner (4 June)

      In this episode, Mandy Turner discusses the vital role think tanks play in the policy process, and in manufacturing consent for government policy. Turner recently published a landmark study of leading Western think tanks and their positions on Israel and Palestine, tracing pronounced pro-Israel bias, where the the key role is primarily the work of senior staff within these institutions, the so-called “gatekeepers.”
Feb 16, 2011 Lebanon
Jadaliyya Reports By :
Jadaliyya Reports

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 

[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412