National Students for Justice in Palestine Conference Opposes “Normalizing” Israeli Human Rights Abuses

[Noura Erekat during her keynote address to the conference. Image by Sara Jawhari via Flickr] [Noura Erekat during her keynote address to the conference. Image by Sara Jawhari via Flickr]

National Students for Justice in Palestine Conference Opposes “Normalizing” Israeli Human Rights Abuses

By : Amith Gupta

Over three hundred student organizers from across the United States converged at the University of Michigan – Ann Arbor over the weekend for the second annual National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP) Conference. In addition to reaffirming the call for boycotts, divestment, and sanctions against the State of Israel for its ongoing human rights violations against the Palestinian people, the student organizers passed a number of resolutions making way for effective national structures to assist in coalition-building, media promotion, fundraising, and other key aspects of the national student campaign for justice in Palestine. The conference also reaffirmed NSJP`s position, maintaining that the role of US solidarity activists is to act at the direction of Palestinian civil society. The students further obtained the support of Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlán (MEChA), one of the country’s largest Chicano students organizations, who have endorsed BDS and had sent representatives to the conference.

But what was particularly significant about the conference was its pointed opposition to efforts by a handful of non-profit and political organizations that have taken to “normalizing” Israeli injustices. Such normalization efforts call for “dialogue” between Israelis and Palestinians in lieu of political pressure on Israel to respect Palestinian rights. Keynote speaker, human rights law professor, and Jadaliyya co-editor Noura Erakat remarked in her speech at the conference,

Failure to address the project of ethnic cleansing will lead us there. It is not that we can`t fight for a political solution … it`s that that solution should not lose sight of this broader project … and for solidarity, the purpose is not to be complicit in an ethnic cleansing movement, and your role as a rights-based movement does that.

She received a roaring applause and a standing ovation for her statements from the student organizers. Following her, UC Berkeley professor, founding SJP member, and director of American Muslims for Palestine, Hatem Bazian, condemned the “Zionization of the movement” to win Palestinian rights in the “age of the NGO-industrial complex”.

Over the weekend, students learned how to put these words into practice. In one session, student organizers learned how to identify and influence active and potential allies. In a number of workshops throughout the weekend, the organizers were taught how to initiate boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) campaigns against the State of Israel on college campuses, including academic and cultural boycotts of Israeli institutions, and divestment from TIAA-CREF financial services for their investments in corporations complicit in Israeli human rights abuses. Other workshops dealt with building alliances with Palestinian activists in Palestine, building coalitions with other communities in struggle in the United States, and engaging in grassroots lobbying at the local level.

\"\"
[The scene inside one of the many workshops at the conference. Image by Sara Jawhari via Flickr]

What ties these efforts together is a refusal to collaborate with any attempt to stymie Palestinian rights through the rhetoric of “dialogue” and normalization. Rather than behaving as though the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one of misunderstanding or cultural problems, student organizers came together recognizing that the injustices of an occupying military power necessitate action – not “dialogue.”

In addition to maintaining an internationally condemned and illegal military occupation of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem, and enforcing what South African legal scholars and the international legal community have labeled an “Apartheid regime” against Palestinians, the State of Israel has continued to engage in gross violations of basic human rights law through its broken ceasefires, indiscriminate acts of violence against Palestinian civilians, its full-scale blockade of Gaza, and its refusal to recognize the right of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes. Israel also continues to violate the Geneva Conventions in its ongoing theft of Palestinian land and construction of illegal Israeli settlement-colonies in the West Bank and Jerusalem. Meanwhile, Palestinians remain stateless, largely defenseless, and subject to the partial governance of a “Palestinian Authority” that has remained weak, undemocratic, and complicit in many of these Israeli abuses.

But multiple well-financed political efforts on American college campuses, sometimes voicing limited criticisms of Israeli policy, or eschewing politics all together, seek to whitewash these injustices. Such initiatives suggest that Israel`s war crimes and other abuses can be solved through dialogue and discussion alone, and that activists should hesitate to boycott, divest, sanction, or otherwise advocate decisively against Israel`s abuses. In their view, exiled and besieged Palestinians can only find peace if they negotiate and dialogue with the very state that is holding them under occupation, keeping them in exile, and stealing their land, effectively forfeiting those rights that are being violated in the process.

Students at the NSJP conference, however, have not been impressed with such efforts. Instead, they came together to forge a national campaign that recognizes the imperative of political pressure on Israel as an occupying military power. Erakat mentioned that campus BDS campaigns are now a top threat to Israel`s hegemony in the Middle East according to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee – third only behind a nuclear Iran and the efforts of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. The developments at the conference suggest that the threat is only growing. Rather than sacrifice justice and Palestinian rights for a submissive and oppressive order that conflates Palestinian subjugation with “peace,” students recognized that genuine peace requires justice – and justice necessitates action.

\"\"
[Conference participants during one of the all-conference meetings. Image by Sara Jawhari via Flickr]

The SJP student leaders have answered the call to action by eschewing normalization efforts to whitewash Israel`s abuses, and opting for BDS, grassroots lobbying, and support for non-violent peace activism in Palestine itself. Although normalization efforts remain a well-funded obstacle to the call for justice in Palestine, the growing student movement for Palestinian rights indicates that the farce of “dialogue” over action will not be successful. The ascendance of equal rights for Israelis and Palestinians is on the horizon, with student organizers supporting the movement at the helm.

\"\"
[Some of the organizers and voluneteers at the NSJP 2012 Conference. Image by Sara Jawhari via Flickr]

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412