Call for Papers: The Arab Council for the Social Sciences' Inaugural Conference (19-20 March, Beirut)

[Arab Council for the Social Sciences logo. Image from theacss.org] [Arab Council for the Social Sciences logo. Image from theacss.org]

Call for Papers: The Arab Council for the Social Sciences' Inaugural Conference (19-20 March, Beirut)

By : Jadaliyya Reports

The Arab Council for the Social Sciences` Inaugural Conference
19-20 March 2013
Beirut, Lebanon

The Arab Council for the Social Sciences is pleased to announce its inaugural conference, titled Arab Transformations: Interrogating the Social Sciences, to be held in Beirut, Lebanon on 19-20 March 2013. The conference will showcase papers and panels from on-going projects of the ACSS including “The New Paradigms Factory,” “Inequality, Mobility and Development” and “Producing the Public in the Arab Region.” In addition, a number of panels will feature papers selected through an open call addressing the two themes described below. The deadline for submission is 11 February 2013. Papers will be selected based on two criteria:

  • The extent to which they engage seriously with the aim of the conference to challenge and/or nuance prevailing concepts and theories in the social sciences generally, and those pertaining to the Arab region particularly.
  • The empirical depth of the paper and the focus on innovative cases and locations, especially in relation to current social forces and mobilization in the Arab region.

The conference is open to papers from all social science and allied disciplines. Researchers from the Arab region, whether currently resident in or outside the region, are particularly encouraged to apply. Applicants must hold at least a MA degree and be actively engaged in social science research. Papers may examine contemporary or historical phenomena and comparative, cross-regional and global perspectives are encouraged.

Paper proposals should fall into one of the following two rubrics:

Theme 1: New/Old Social Movements

The transformations witnessed by the Arab region since 2011 raise questions concerning the nature of the social movements that are transforming the region in a context of sharply increasing social inequalities and the retreat of the state from its traditional economic and social functions. Many parties were caught by surprise at the rapidity of the changes that reached the top echelons of regimes as well as by the holistic nature of the social movements that combine social, economic and normative demands. The social sciences need to interrogate the relationships between older and emergent social movements, especially in terms of their understandings and strategies of: the dynamics of social change; political legitimacy of both regimes and oppositional movements; and the forms and practices of political representation. Also important to analyze are the wider and global contexts of these movements in terms of networks, funding and power relations.

Papers of relevance to this theme would examine cases related to:

  • The relationship between older and new social movements in particular countries and locations including discourses concerning the ‘organizational inadequacy’ of new movements and the call for them to renew their linkages to parties, unions and associations in order to become ‘more effective’;
  • The study of social movements in terms of their structure and aims (e.g. labor unions, women’s movements, student movements)  evaluating the importance of social homogeneity and organization in the effectiveness of these movements;
  • A re-reading of the sociology of the rural and the urban and the role of rural/urban linkages in social movements, whether old or new;
  • The study of protest movements, old and new, especially those reflecting local demands. How do new discourses of ‘broader freedoms’ and ‘increased ability to express demands’ affect such movements?;
  • The study of the phenomena of violence including symbolic violence, which can either erase or recognize the ‘other’, and physical violence, whether practiced by state forces or opposition movements.

Theme 2: New/Old Political Orders

The uprisings in the Arab region, and the scramble to give meaning to them, have created both new geopolitical realities and new debates regarding the direction of the emerging regional political order(s). Following the apparent collapse of the old political order that had relied on Western-backed authoritarian states, non-state and transnational actors and networks--ranging from protestors and emergent social movements in cities like Cairo, Manama and Sana’a, to Hizbullah and other members of the ‘Resistance Axis’, to the Islamist and Salafist movements across the region, to regional security organizations such as the Gulf Cooperation Council—have become increasingly influential players.

Papers of relevance to this theme would examine cases related to:

  • Contradictory political pulls between centralizing and de-centralizing and/or fragmenting forces and logics within different countries of the region, as for example in Somalia, Sudan, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Iraq and Lebanon.
  • Inter-state repercussions of events and violence within particular countries, both within the region and cross regionally (e.g. spillovers from Syria into Lebanon and Turkey; or from Libya into Mali)
  • The roles of older and newer regional powers such as Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Iran in shaping new orders along lines favorable to their own perceived interests and those of their international patrons.
  • The global context of these geopolitical shifts, from the ailing neoliberal political economy, to the retreating US empire and neocolonial European aspirations, to the international organizations such as the United Nations, working in tandem with (or in contradiction to) the various state and non-state actors in the region.
  • The production of contested visions for, and meanings to, an emerging Arab political order(s), including new understanding of the state and of state-society relations.

Application Instructions and Conference Information:

To submit a paper proposal, please provide a completed cover sheet and an abstract of 1 page (or approximately 400 words). These documents should be emailed to admin@theacss.org by the submission deadline of 11 February 2013 in either .doc, .docx, or .pdf format. Proposals may be submitted in Arabic, English or French and should be in the language of the planned paper and presentation.

Please note that applicants can submit a co-authored paper proposal. However, if selected for inclusion in the conference, the ACSS can only guarantee financial support for the primary author. The ACSS will decide if it is possible to provide support for a second author on a case-by-case basis after the selection decisions have been announced.

Selection decisions will be made by February 20, 2013.

Selected participants are strongly encouraged to bring  completed papers for circulation at the conference. All conference abstracts will be posted on the ACSS website and made publicly available, and paper presenters may be asked to revise their abstracts for posting. In addition, after the conference the ACSS will invite a number of papers for inclusion in one or more publications, which may include translation of the paper into different languages.

The ACSS Conference Committee will organize the selected papers in thematic panels.  Conference presentations should be 15 minutes per paper and may be presented in Arabic, English or French. Simultaneous translation from English and French into Arabic will be provided but only if authors are able to provide the text in advance. The conference site will be A/V equipped. Additional details on the composition of individual panels will be available after selection decisions are announced in late-February.

Paper presenters will be covered fully for economy-class travel and accommodation costs. The ACSS will provide up to three-four nights’ accommodations, based on flight availability and travel itineraries.

If not selected to present a paper at the conference, please note that applicants are encouraged to register to attend the conference, which will be open to the public. Click here for the online registration form. All general registrants will receive a confirmation email once their registration form has been processed, and will receive additional details on the conference, including a final conference agenda, by March 8, 2013.Please note that financial travel support will not be provided, but the ACSS will provide lunch to those that have registered in advance.

Download the application cover sheet here.

If you wish to register to attend the conference, please complete and submit the General Pre-Registration Form by March 1, 2013.

Questions? Please contact: admin@theacss.org

  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 9: Islamophobia, the West, and Genocide with Hatem Bazian

      Long Form Podcast Episode 9: Islamophobia, the West, and Genocide with Hatem Bazian

      Hatem Bazian addresses the historical trajectory of Islamophobia and its significance in understanding geopolitical transformation in the post-Cold War world. As Western ideologues shifted from their focus on the Soviet Union after the Cold War, and increasingly adopted the Clash of Civilizations paradigm to undergird their maintenance of global hegemony, Islam and Muslims replaced communism as the chief bogeyman. Bazian explains how and why this came about, and the centrality Palestine played in its development and operation, both in the West and for Israel. He also addresses US government disciplining of universities and particularly student activists.

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 8: Resigning the State Department Over Gaza With Hala Rharrit

      Long Form Podcast Episode 8: Resigning the State Department Over Gaza With Hala Rharrit

      In this episode of Long Form, Hala Rharrit discusses the factors that led her to resign from the US State Department, the mechanisms by which institutional corruption and ideological commitments of officials and representatives ensure US support for Israel, and how US decision-makers consistently violate international law and US laws/legislation. Rharrit also addresses the Trump administration’s claim that South Africa is perpetrating genocide against the country’s Afrikaaner population, and how this intersects with the US-Israeli campaign of retribution against South Africa for hauling Israel before the ICJ on charges of genocide.

    • Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      The entire globe stands behind Israel as it faces its most intractable existential crisis since it started its slow-motion Genocide in 1948. People of conscience the world over are in tears as Israel has completely run out of morals and laws to violate during its current faster-paced Genocide in Gaza. Israelis, state and society, feel helpless, like sitting ducks, as they search and scramble for an inkling of hope that they might find one more human value to desecrate, but, alas, their efforts remain futile. They have covered their grounds impeccably and now have to face the music. This is an emergency call for immediate global solidarity with Israel’s quest far a lot more annihilation. Please lend a helping limb.

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412