Announcing The New Issue of Middle East Report Spring 2013

[Crop from cover of Spring 2013 issue of Middle East Report] [Crop from cover of Spring 2013 issue of Middle East Report]

Announcing The New Issue of Middle East Report Spring 2013

By : MERIP Editors

IRAQ TEN YEARS LATER

With few exceptions, the rush of reflections on the decennial marker of the US-led invasion of Iraq ignored the fact that the war happened mostly for Iraqis. Already devastated by 20 years of war, sanctions and dictatorship, Iraq suffered another decade of foreign occupation, civil strife and mass displacement. The spring 2013 issue of Middle East Report takes a hard look at “Iraq Ten Years Later,” including the question of why the Bush administration launched the war in the first place.

Joost Hiltermann surveys the political scene in the country under Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. There are visible traces of the eight-year US occupation in the hand gestures of soldiers at checkpoints and new US-supplied weaponry. But the democracy that the US said it would leave behind is not so apparent. As Nada Shabout writes of the celebrations of Baghdad as Arab Cultural Capital for 2013, the Maliki government is deploying state patronage of the arts in a manner reminiscent of its predecessors.

The 2003 invasion, in many ways, had a multiplier effect on the damage done by the preceding 13 years of comprehensive UN sanctions. In his examination of Iraq’s economy, for instance, Bassam Yousif finds that lack of capacity -- brain drain and dilapidated infrastructure -- goes a long way toward explaining the sluggish pace of recovery. Nida Alahmad shows how sanctions-era deterioration, post-2003 violence and US mismanagement combined to keep round-the-clock electricity a distant dream.

For the Iraqi people, too, the ravages of the war compounded the hardships of sanctions and authoritarian rule. Some 3 million Iraqis remain refugees outside their country or internally displaced, in addition to those who had to flee earlier crises. Isis Nusair chronicles the gendered challenges facing Iraqi women refugees in Jordan. War and displacement have also exacerbated the problems for women working at Iraqi universities, as Nadje Al-Ali documents.

Also featured: Dan Connell files an update on the travails of Eritrean refugeesZuzanna Olszewska explores the “global Hazara awakening” spurred by sectarian attacks in Pakistan; Roger Owen reviews Joseph Sassoon’s Saddam Hussein’s Ba‘th Party; and more.

Subscribe to Middle East Report or order individual copies here.

For further information, contact Chris Toensing at ctoensing@merip.org.

Middle East Report is published by the Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP), a progressive, independent organization based in Washington, DC. Since 1971 MERIP has provided critical analysis of the Middle East, focusing on political economy, popular struggles, and the implications of US and international policy for the region.

  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • Announcing the New Issue of Middle East Report (MER 292/293): Return to Revolution

      Announcing the New Issue of Middle East Report (MER 292/293): Return to Revolution

      The 2019 uprisings in Sudan, Algeria, Lebanon and Iraq, in addition resurgent protests in Morocco and Jordan—all countries that did not experience revolutionary uprisings in 2011—extend the previous wave of revolt to the rest of the region.  Protestors are no longer content with merely toppling their unelected dictators as we saw in 2011: They are demanding a fundamental change of the entire political and economic system.  In Iraq and Lebanon they are also rejecting the entire political class and their use of sectarianism to maintain their wealth and rule chanting “All of them means all of them!”

      MERIP devotes this double issue Return to Revolution to assessing the nature and challenges confronting this new wave of uprisings through the interrelated themes of continuity, entanglement and counterrevolution.

    • Announcing the New Issue of Middle East Report (MER 286): Suffering and the Limits of Relief

      Announcing the New Issue of Middle East Report (MER 286): Suffering and the Limits of Relief

      Human suffering is at record levels globally as a result of violent conflicts in some countries and the ravaging effects of neoliberal economic policies and climate change-related disasters in others. The number of refugees and asylum seekers trying to find safety and relief is larger than any time since World War II, and so is the number of people facing severe hunger and malnutrition. While the humanitarian system, a conglomeration of international and local agencies, provides emergency relief to those barely hanging on in zones of conflict or extreme deprivation, the current state of humanitarianism is incapable of redressing the causes of mass suffering and offers no solution for today’s conflicts. 

    • Announcing the New Issue of Middle East Report (MER 284) in partnership with NACLA: The Latin East

      Announcing the New Issue of Middle East Report (MER 284) in partnership with NACLA: The Latin East

      This double issue of Middle East Report, “The Latin East,” is a collaboration with the North American Congress on Latin America (NACLA). We publish it in tandem with the current issue of NACLA Report on the Americas, which is available for free online at 
www.tandfonline.com/toc/rnac20/50/1. With the kind permission of Routledge, we reprint in this magazine two essays originally appearing in NACLA’s issue of “The Latin East.”

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412