March Madness: Theirs and Ours

Memorial poster for Kimani Gray. Image by Lucas Jackson via Reuters. Memorial poster for Kimani Gray. Image by Lucas Jackson via Reuters.

March Madness: Theirs and Ours

By : Jadaliyya Reports

 March Madness: Theirs and Ours

[The following Month in Review on Washington`s Wars and Occupations was written by Michael Reagan and published on 31 March 2013 in War Times.]

It`s March and despite what you read on the sports pages, the real madness in the country isn`t on the basketball court. It`s on the streets of New York, where police murder another Black teenager. It`s in Steubenville, Ohio, where a teenage girl is raped by high school athletes and a culture of misogyny blames the victim. It`s in the tenth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, which passed without a single perpetrator of that lie-based bloodletting facing any consequences whatsoever. And it`s in “sequestration,” a special kind of “structural violence” that targets the most vulnerable among us. This kind of madness, madness from the top, rooted in the violence and self-interest of the powerful, is enough to drive many of the rest of us mad in a different sense. We`re mad with the kind of anger and outrage that leads to resistance. 

Iraq – I Forget You 

March 19 marked the ten-year anniversary of the official invasion of Iraq, and still the human devastation continues to pile up like trash and wreckage in the streets of Baghdad.  Among the detritus is the personal story of Tomas Young, a soldier and resister, subject of the 2007 film “Body of War.” Young decided this month to kill himself by starvation. In 2003, on his first day in Iraq, his truck was shot at by insurgents. Young’s spinal cord was severed. In the years since, a combination of poor medical care and his deteriorating condition caused him such excruciating pain that Young decided to end his life. Considering his death part of his resistance to the Army and the Iraq War, Young made his suicide public in a letter to George Bush and Dick Cheney, expressing the rage, sorrow, and madness of so many who dealt with the war personally.

The tragedy of the loss of Young is just the tip of the iceberg.  His action highlights the physical and mental condition of so many, especially the countless Iraqi civilians whose lives have been destroyed by the war.  A comprehensive report from Brown University’s Cost of War project chronicles the continuing impacts of the war. Hundreds of thousands killed, the overwhelming majority civilian, by direct violence. The report notes that with secondary effects included, the loss of health care facilities (intentionally targeted by the U.S.), infrastructure, the environmental impacts of depleted uranium and other toxins, the death toll is much higher.  This kind of calculus is hard to process, its human impacts beyond rational thought.

In addition to the deaths, Iraq’s infrastructure and civil society are in shambles. Human Rights Watch reports that the Iraqi government is increasingly authoritarian and makes regular use of torture and disappearances. Their report highlights that these are U.S. responsibilities since “the abuses U.S. officials allegedly authorized in the early years of the war…and their tacit or direct complicity in Iraqi abuses throughout the occupation, are all partly responsible for the entrenchment of weak and corrupt institutions in Iraq.” 

The HRW report was supplemented this month by an explosive investigation by the UK Guardian that linked the establishment of secret Iraqi police squads for torture and disappearances - the so-called El Salvador option- directly to the highest level of US planners. The report has the man responsible for establishing death squads in El Salvador and Iraq, James Steele, mentioned in public addresses by name by none other than Donald Rumsfeld. Rumsfeld forwarded Steele’s memos directly to Bush and Cheney.

Human Rights Watch notes that neither the UK nor the US has “set in motion a comprehensive public inquiry into the abuse, nor held senior-level officials accountable for war crimes.” So while the deaths and human misery in the wake of the horrible war continue to pile up, no one in the US, especially not George Bush, who has taken to amateur painting, nor Dick Cheney, who recently told the press that “if I had to do it over again, I’d do it in a minute,” is being held accountable under the Obama administration. 

This is in stark contrast to the genocide trials in Guatemala, undertaken on the same day as the Iraq war anniversary. In Guatemala, General Efrain Rios Montt and several of his associates are facing trial for the crimes they committed in the genocidal civil war.  A coalition of civil society groups, including indigenous organizations and human rights and legal aid programs have struggled for decades to bring those responsible to account. It’s a lesson in social justice organizing that we have a lot to learn from here.  

In the U.S., the culture of impunity is not just limited to Bush, Cheney, and the invasion of Iraq.  Obama, too, has committed war crimes. Among them are assassinations of U.S. citizens and their children and the now public legal justification for it, and the never-ending nightmare of Guantanamo, where in the last months one hundred remaining detainees have sustained a nearly two-month hunger strike, while one of their members was shot by a guard for trying to escape. These crimes, and the impunity mentioned here, of Iraq, Guantanamo and targeted assassinations, the impunity of the executive, is not just limited to the Chief Executive, but to the entire executive class, the rich and powerful banks and CEOs who act criminally without consequence, as Glenn Greenwald points out in his most recent book. The crimes of Iraq, the human devastation, the impunity, and the realization that these atrocities barely scratch the surface of ongoing US crimes, are the madness of America, a madness from the top, of power and violence and privilege.

Wars at Home 

While Thomas Young in Kansas City dies for the crimes of power, in New York and cities across the nation, Black youth like Kimani Gray are murdered in an entirely different kind of madness. Gray, a sixteen year-old East Flatbush, Brooklyn resident, was shot by police in unknown circumstances.  Witnesses say Gray was prostrate on the ground pleading for his life when officers shot him.  Police say the teenager, known as Kiki to his friends and family, was moving in a threatening or suspicious manner and that a revolver was found nearby.  The two officers involved in the shooting have between them five civil rights and excessive force lawsuits that the NYPD settled for hundreds of thousands of dollars. But the death of Gray, coupled with countless other murders of innocent Black youth by police, including Darius Simmons, Oscar Grant, and Aiyana Jones, and others, is another form of American madness. In the first half of 2012 one-hundred and ten Black people were killed by police and security in the US, a number that the Malcolm X Grassroots Project used to estimate that a Black person is murdered by police once every forty hours. 

In East Flatbush, the murder of Gray sparked four days of confrontation with the police. Residents demonstrated in the streets and berated officers, and when the police declared the area a “Frozen Zone,” preventing media access to the area.  Despite the media lock-out, peoples’ voices were heard. Some residents complained that police brutality and police harassment, amount to a new type of Jim Crow, a war on Black and Brown people. Sophie Lewis, a labor reporter who was at the demonstrations, characterized the demonstrators’ view of the police as a “racist paramilitary organization operating in their neighborhood with impunity”; echoes of Iraq, and part of legacy of America’s racial violence - from the Klan to "Minutemen" border vigilantes - madness with a long history.  

Justice for Jane Doe

If the war on black people offers one kind of American madness, another is the nation’s war on women.  The latest episode to spark national outrage, the Steubenville rape case, is, like the murder of Gray, or the crimes of Iraq, is just the tip of a much larger structure of violence. Steubenville is remarkable because we know about it at all. Author Rebecca Solnit estimates that worldwide a rape happens every minute, most of these never discussed, reported, or brought to justice. Steubenville became news, and the rapists were prosecuted, because of the efforts of bloggers and activists who refused to let the case drop into the background normal intensity of violence against women. In this case, the horror of the assault was compounded by the reception it got from witnesses, who didn’t act to stop the crime, the openness of the rapists who videoed and joked about their assault, and the media which lamented the harshness of the sentences for promising athletes.  Feminist activists and writers used the case to talk about “rape culture,” a patriarchal set of values that blames women, and excuses the violence of perpetrators.  But they might as well call it “American culture” for the prevalence of these values – impunity, support for power, and violence – in our society. 

Structural Madness

Sequestration is a marvelous euphemism, and a rather ingenious political tactic. It is a form of violence to take away peoples’ livelihood and the basic structures of support on which those on the bottom have to come to depend. The exact impact of the cuts is unknown, as everything in the economy, schools, welfare projects, charitable spending, environmental protections will take a hit. No one doubts the effects will be ruthless. With fifty million people going hungry in this country (one in six), fifteen million children living in poverty (one in five), and unknown millions, including college grads and people with jobs, homeless, or on the edge, these populations will be pushed further into the margins. The roughly four million people completely dependent on government programs to meet basic needs will find survival more difficult.  This on top of a radical shift of wealth to top, whereby the bottom ninety percent of earners increased their income by only fifty-nine dollars in the last four decades. These kinds of attacks on the necessities of life for so many are a form of violence, another manifestation of American madness. 

Sequestration is also utterly contrived in both a political and fiscal sense. Politically, the sequester is a maneuver for both Democrats and Republicans to impose harsh and unpopular cuts on poor and working people without taking responsibility for their actions.  The cuts are imposed automatically across the board, so no single political actor can be blamed for making them happen – including Obama. In the budget negotiations ongoing for dozens of months, Obama has been privately maneuvering Democratic Party members to support cuts to entitlements. His cuts are not nearly as drastic as are those of the Republicans, but the agenda is roughly the same – continue to take more and more from the poor. The question of how much more is the scope of the debate of Washington politics. 

Sequestration is mad in another sense, too – it harms the economy.  A growing chorus of mainstream economists, including Dean Baker, Paul Krugman and Joseph Stiglitz, argue that spending cuts justified by the appeal to deficit reduction will only continue the recession. Those at the top have plenty of money to mitigate spending increases.  Corporate profits, the stock market, and executive pay packages are the highest they have ever been. The madness of the austerity agenda couldn’t be any clearer, and the violence in these choices will only become more evident. 

Our Madness

That`s the madness from the top. Our madness, from the bottom, looks very different.  Our madness is born from anger and sorrow, a reaction to the violence and aggression, the division, racism, assault, and brutality. We are mad to be subject to this, and mad to tolerate it.  Which is why we fight back. We resist, like those in East Flatbush who refuse to let police violence continue unabated. Like women activists and writers who brought the Steubenville rape case to light. Like those fighting from the bottom to keep our social safety net intact. And those who fight against the continuing devastation of the Iraq war. Like Thomas Young, who uses his death, the last vestiges of his life, to fight back against the madness from the top. We are mad, and our madness is the only hope for a sane society.

  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      The entire globe stands behind Israel as it faces its most intractable existential crisis since it started its slow-motion Genocide in 1948. People of conscience the world over are in tears as Israel has completely run out of morals and laws to violate during its current faster-paced Genocide in Gaza. Israelis, state and society, feel helpless, like sitting ducks, as they search and scramble for an inkling of hope that they might find one more human value to desecrate, but, alas, their efforts remain futile. They have covered their grounds impeccably and now have to face the music. This is an emergency call for immediate global solidarity with Israel’s quest far a lot more annihilation. Please lend a helping limb.

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 7: Think Tanks and Manufactuing Consent with Mandy Turner (4 June)

      Long Form Podcast Episode 7: Think Tanks and Manufactuing Consent with Mandy Turner (4 June)

      In this episode, Mandy Turner discusses the vital role think tanks play in the policy process, and in manufacturing consent for government policy. Turner recently published a landmark study of leading Western think tanks and their positions on Israel and Palestine, tracing pronounced pro-Israel bias, where the the key role is primarily the work of senior staff within these institutions, the so-called “gatekeepers.”

    • Long Form Podcast: Our Next Three Episodes

      Long Form Podcast: Our Next Three Episodes
      Long Form Podcast(Episodes 7, 8, & 9) Upcoming Guests:Mandy TurnerHala RharritHatem Bazian Hosts:Mouin RabbaniBassam Haddad   Watch Here:Youtube.com/JadaliyyaX.com/Jadaliyya There can be

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412