Conference--AUB City Debates 2014: Of Property in Planning (Beirut, 7-8 March)

Conference--AUB City Debates 2014: Of Property in Planning (Beirut, 7-8 March)

Conference--AUB City Debates 2014: Of Property in Planning (Beirut, 7-8 March)

By : Jadaliyya Reports

City Debates is a yearly conference organized by the Masters in Urban Planning & Policy and Masters in Urban Design Programs at the American University of Beirut. Started in 2002, City Debates brings together professionals, academics, and students from Beirut and beyond to explore issues of contemporary relevance to the urbanization of the region. The series aims to document, analyze, and compare emerging practices that are transforming the cities and regions of the Middle-East. It also aims to foster a platform of exchange at the regional level where investigative frameworks are proposed and practical experiences and know-how are shared. By carefully selecting each year a timely theme to address, City Debates` ambition is to propose innovative ways of understanding contemporary urbanization and to usher creative strategies to respond to the daunting challenges. It is also to inscribe a debate about the specificities of our region outside the traditional middle-eastern exceptionalism in which it is often trapped. In previous years, City Debates has addressed Master Planning in Lebanon, Cultural Heritage and the Politics of the Present, Spaces of Faith and Fun, Security of/in the City, Urbanism in the Arab World, Emerging Practices in Urban Design, and Rethinking Informality: Design Tactics/Planning Strategies. This website gives access to previous conferences programs as well as their published outputs.

This year’s City Debates is entitled Of Property in Planning: Historical Transformations and Contemporary Practices. The global financial crisis in the sub-prime mortgage crisis and the increasing exclusion of most city-dwellers from access to affordable housing has brought to the fore the dramatic effects of the domination of the exchange value of land and housing stock, used as commodities to generate profit, over their use-value as shelters, as David Harvey has shown in his work. Furthermore, the devastating powers of real estate markets over urban landscapes and their ability to trump all other processes of spatial transformation have eloquently reflected the consequences of a strictly propertied understanding of the natural and built environments. This has driven many (Peter Marcuse, Vincent Renard, as well as, earlier, Henri Lefebvre) to think both of different models of property and of tax-policies, in order to restrict speculation, provide shelter, and empower non-propertied claims over the. City Debates 2014 is an attempt to put such proposals and concerns in conversation with recent debates on property in anthropology, geography, history, law, and planning. By bringing policy-oriented proposals with critical discussions, the conference hopes to allow for a critical assessment of how these new models and proposals can work in the world around us, particularly in the Arab Middle-East. The conference program, bios and abstracts is accessible here.

American University of Beirut, FEA, Department of Architecture and Design

City Debates 2014, March 7-8

Of Property in Planning: Historical Transformations and Contemporary Practices

Friday 7 March

9:30 Introduction     

  • Makram Suidan, Dean of the Faculty of Engineering & Architecture, AUB
  • Mona Fawaz, Associate Professor and Coordinator, MUPP/MUD, AUB
  • Nada Moumtaz, Assistant professor in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures and Comparative Studies, Ohio State University

10:00 Keynote

  • Nicholas Blomley - Why and how property matters to planning
  • Discussant: Omar Razzaz

11:15-11:45 Coffee Break

11:45-1:30 Panel 1:  Law and Property

  • Edesio Fernandes - A step towards the right to the city? An assessment of Brazil`s 2001 City Statute
  • Ayona Datta - The elusive struggle for the legal city: Squatters, tenure and the myth of resettlement in Delhi slums
  • Ann Varley - Normalising informal settlements? Titling and the construction of everyday properties
  • Discussant: Samer Ghamroun  

1:30-3:00 Lunch

3:00-4:30: Panel 2:  Representing Property

  • Yucel Kaya - Politics of cadastral property assessment in the Ottoman provincial towns in the nineteenth century
  • Aziz Hallaj - Cadasters, property and the creation of Modernity in the Levant       
  • David Correia - The fetishism of common property and its secret
  • Discussant: Richard Smith  

4:30-5:00 Coffee Break

5:00 Interactive Presentation       

  • Land Politics in a neoliberal monarchical state, by the Seas of Sand Research Collective
  • Respondent: Fawwaz Traboulsi

 
Saturday 8 March

9:30-11:00 Panel 3: Making Private Property

  • Martha Mundy, Cynthia Gharios, & Saker El Nour - The urban in the rural:  commodification, land-use and landscape in a village of S Lebanon (19th – 21st centuries)
  • Mona Fawaz - The politics of property in planning: Hezbollah’s reconstruction of Haret Hreik (Beirut, Lebanon) as case study
  • Ozan Karaman - Contested trajectories of urban renewal in Istanbul
  • Discussant: Vijay Prashad

11:00-11:30 Coffee Break
 
11:30am-1pm Panel 4: Thinking Property Otherwise

  • Nada Moumtaz - Alienating inalienables, remaking the Muslim community: waqf exchanges during the reconstruction of Beirut`s Central District
  • Abir Saksouk-Sasso - Contesting national authority in the construction of public space: Dalieh or the making of communal spaces in Beirut
  • Discussant: Nadia von Maltzahn
     

 1:00-2:30   Lunch
 
2:30-4:30 Roundtable: Taxation

  • Charbel Nahas, Economist and Professor at AUB, LAU, Lebanese University
  • Vincent Renard, Economist and Director of Research at the French National Centre for Scientific Research
  • Discussant: Mounir Rached, Vice President and a founding member of the Lebanese Economic Association
  • Panel Moderator: Mona Harb


4:30-5:00 Closing

 \"\"

  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 8: Resigning the State Department Over Gaza With Hala Rharrit

      Long Form Podcast Episode 8: Resigning the State Department Over Gaza With Hala Rharrit

      In this episode of Long Form, Hala Rharrit discusses the factors that led her to resign from the US State Department, the mechanisms by which institutional corruption and ideological commitments of officials and representatives ensure US support for Israel, and how US decision-makers consistently violate international law and US laws/legislation. Rharrit also addresses the Trump administration’s claim that South Africa is perpetrating genocide against the country’s Afrikaaner population, and how this intersects with the US-Israeli campaign of retribution against South Africa for hauling Israel before the ICJ on charges of genocide.

    • Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      The entire globe stands behind Israel as it faces its most intractable existential crisis since it started its slow-motion Genocide in 1948. People of conscience the world over are in tears as Israel has completely run out of morals and laws to violate during its current faster-paced Genocide in Gaza. Israelis, state and society, feel helpless, like sitting ducks, as they search and scramble for an inkling of hope that they might find one more human value to desecrate, but, alas, their efforts remain futile. They have covered their grounds impeccably and now have to face the music. This is an emergency call for immediate global solidarity with Israel’s quest far a lot more annihilation. Please lend a helping limb.

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 7: Think Tanks and Manufactuing Consent with Mandy Turner (4 June)

      Long Form Podcast Episode 7: Think Tanks and Manufactuing Consent with Mandy Turner (4 June)

      In this episode, Mandy Turner discusses the vital role think tanks play in the policy process, and in manufacturing consent for government policy. Turner recently published a landmark study of leading Western think tanks and their positions on Israel and Palestine, tracing pronounced pro-Israel bias, where the the key role is primarily the work of senior staff within these institutions, the so-called “gatekeepers.”

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412