Boycotting Israeli Academic Institutions: Advice for Anthropologists

New Article Submission

Thank you for your interest in Jadaliyya. We welcome all submissions. The most significant requirement is for Jadaliyya submissions to be analytically compelling and offer a perspective or argument that has not been covered at length either on Jadaliyya or elsewhere. Because of the volume of submissions, well-written pieces are prioritized. Length is flexible, 1000 to 2500 words is the average range. However, we will accept longer pieces. Once submitted, several members of the editorial committee will review your piece and one of them will inform you of the decision.
Author Details
Article Details
Select Countries
Select Keywords
Select Topics
Only RTF, Word, and Pages documents accepted.

Recommended image size: 762x800 px

Location of each image should be indicated in the text of the article via a square bracket caption that includes: (1) a description of the image; (2) the photographer/designer and source of the image. Please note we only use images you as the author have the right to use, which usually means those of your own creation or those published under Creative Commons. Alternatively, you need specific permission from the copyright holder.
Please read the Release Form and provide an electronic signature [your full name] below to confirm that you accept its terms
Required
Hyperlink words in your article if they refer to links on the internet. We encourage more, rather than less, links (try to avoid footnotes—embed them as hyperlinks if possible)

Article added successfully.

Pages Menu BETA
Jul 23, 2015 Palestine-Israel
[Image from www.shutterstock.com] [Image from www.shutterstock.com]

Boycotting Israeli Academic Institutions: Advice for Anthropologists

By : Jadaliyya Reports

Anthropologists for the Boycott of Israeli Academic Institutions is a group of concerned scholars, part of the growing global movement calling for Boycotts, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) against the state of Israel. The boycott movement seeks to end Israel’s widespread, systematic, and long-standing violations of the rights of the Palestinian people whether in exile, under occupation, or consigned to second-class citizenship. The academic boycott is particularly concerned with Israel’s violations of Palestinians’ right to education and academic freedom, as well as with the complicity of Israeli academic institutions in these systemic injustices.

We are campaigning for the American Anthropological Association (AAA) to endorse and adopt the academic boycott. This boycott would require the AAA as an organization not to collaborate with Israeli academic institutions. The boycott would not prevent individual Israeli scholars from participating in AAA activities, nor would it impose any requirements or restrictions on AAA members’ individual relations with Israeli scholars or institutions.

Over 1,100 anthropologists have already pledged to boycott Israeli academic institutions in their individual capacities. For individual scholars, the boycott covers collaboration on projects and events involving Israeli academic institutions; teaching or attending conferences and other events at such institutions; and publishing in academic journals based in Israel. Through their actions, individual anthropologists can show the AAA that the academic boycott is not only a matter of ethical and political urgency, but is also feasible and indeed already occurring in practice, albeit without the visibility and impact that an organizational boycott would entail.

This document provides advice to help anthropologists implement the boycott in their individual capacities. It includes general principles and suggestions for dealing with specific questions and draws on July 2014 guidelines issued by the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic & Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI). The advice contained here is only for individuals who choose to respect the boycott; any future boycott adopted by the AAA as an organization would not govern members’ conduct and would therefore not incorporate this material.

This document does not cover every eventuality. Instead, it aims to provide a useful framework to help scholars make informed, practical decisions for themselves in implementing the boycott. In this light, we are inspired by the AAA’s Principles of Professional Responsibility, which “address general circumstances, priorities and relationships, and also provide helpful specific examples, that should be considered in anthropological work and ethical decision-making. The individual anthropologist must be willing to make carefully considered ethical choices and be prepared to make clear the assumptions, facts and considerations on which those choices are based.”

[Click here to download the document as a PDF file]

General Principles

Goals

The academic boycott is an act of protest against the systematic dispossession, occupation, and discrimination experienced by the Palestinian people at the hands of the state of Israel, including and especially violations of the rights to education and of academic freedom. For scholars with ties to the United States, the boycott is also an important way to oppose Washington’s unconditional military, financial, and political support for Israel. Finally, the boycott is an expression of solidarity with our Palestinian colleagues, who have called upon us to help secure their basic academic and educational rights.

Israel enjoys close relationships with the United States and many countries in Europe, including academic ties. As scholars, we are in a position to disrupt those relationships as a means of signaling to the Israeli and the US governments that their actions are not legitimate and that we refuse to carry on “business as usual” under these circumstances.

At the same time, the boycott is designed to allow flexibility and to enable co-resistance activities that support colleagues located in Israeli institutions who work strenuously to oppose the state’s actions. In all cases, we hope scholars are able to make informed judgments about how best to balance the goal of denying legitimacy to Israeli institutions against the need for individual flexibility.

In facing any situation not covered by this document, it is best to keep in mind the overall goal of protesting Israel’s illegal actions and pressuring Israeli institutions, while maintaining some flexibility to support allies on the ground. We encourage scholars to treat the following as a guide and supplement to the PACBI guidelines and AAA Principles of Professional Responsibility as they apply the boycott in their own professional lives.

Who Can Participate in the Boycott?

Any scholar can join the academic boycott, although this document is written with anthropologists in mind.

This boycott does not call for Israeli citizens or Palestinians living under Israeli rule to participate.

To Whom Does the Boycott Apply?

The boycott applies to the Israeli state and to Israeli academic institutions such as universities, colleges, research institutes, scholarly associations, think tanks, publications, and publishing houses, unless they have (1) recognized the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people under international law and (2) moved to end any complicity with the violation of these rights.

In cases of doubt as to whether an institution is covered by the boycott, scholars should use their best judgment as to how best to further the goals of the boycott as outlined by Palestinian civil society. They may also consult with PACBI for further advice at pacbi@pacbi.org.

Individuals may also wish to extend the boycott to non-Israeli institutions and events that are explicitly committed to supporting the state of Israel and its policies.

To Whom Does the Boycott Not Apply?

The boycott does not apply to Israeli scholars acting in their individual capacity. Mere affiliation of an Israeli scholar to an Israeli academic institution is not grounds for boycotting them. Similarly, the fact that an Israeli academic receives funds from his or her government or institution in support of academic activities, such as attendance at international conferences, is not itself grounds for boycotting them.

Collaboration with individual Israeli scholars on projects receiving funding from the state of Israel or Israeli academic institutions is generally covered by the boycott. Such collaborations, however, are not covered by the boycott if the official funding goes only to the Israeli participants and if the project does not legitimize Israeli institutions by publicly acknowledging or thanking them for the support.

Public Declaration of Boycott Actions

The boycott is an act of protest. Accordingly, we suggest that any refusal to participate in an activity due to the boycott be declared publicly if possible, along with the reasons for declining. “Silently” boycotting by citing reasons unrelated to the boycott or giving no reasons at all is far less effective in contributing to the goal of putting public pressure on Israeli academic institutions. Anthropologists for the Boycott of Israeli Academic Institutions is happy to host such declaration on its website, which can be sent to anthroboycott@gmail.com.

There are some circumstances where scholars may not be able to make such public declarations. People who are at risk of retribution if they publicly declare their support for the boycott should carefully assess their situation, especially if they fear being denied entry into Palestine/Israel and need to travel there for work, family, or other reasons. Likewise, students and those in precarious employment situations may also wish to carefully weigh the consequences of public declarations.

Scope of the Boycott

Academic Events

Academic events sponsored by Israel or Israeli academic institutions -- including conferences, symposia, workshops, and book and museum exhibits -- should be boycotted, whether taking place inside Israel/Palestine or abroad.

Scholars invited to participate in boycottable events should consider instead speaking at any nearby alternative venues as a means to draw attention to the boycott and to further collaboration with allies who are actively working to end Israel’s injustices. For more information on determining whether an alternative venue is compatible with the boycott, see “To Whom Does the Boycott Apply?” on page 2.

Academic Affiliations

Academic appointments and other affiliations with Israeli institutions are covered by the boycott and should therefore be declined. This includes research and teaching appointments at universities and colleges, enrollment in educational programs (whether degree-granting or not), and membership in Israeli scholarly associations.

Honors, Prizes, and Awards

Honors, prizes, and awards conferred by Israel and Israeli academic institutions should be declined.

Publications

Publishing with Israeli academic journals, presses, or other publications is covered by the boycott, as are publications issued under the aegis of the state of Israel or Israeli academic institutions. The boycott also precludes serving on the editorial board or staff of such publications, or participating as an external reviewer or commenter.

The boycott does not prevent Israeli authors from publishing in non-Israeli publications.

Funding

The boycott covers the receipt of funding from the state of Israel and Israeli academic institutions. In addition, academic projects, events, and activities that receive funding from Israel or Israeli academic institutions should be boycotted. For collaborations with individual Israeli scholars who receive state or institutional funding, see “To Whom Does the Boycott Not Apply?” on p. 3.

Academic Service

Academic service work for Israeli institutions is generally covered by the boycott. Accordingly, scholars who are asked to sit on PhD committees, or act as external examiners or reviewers for dissertations, theses, or departments should consider the BDS guidelines and weigh their recommendations before agreeing to such requests.  

Writing letters for admission, hiring, promotion, or tenure that are addressed to Israeli institutions should also be weighed in light of of the BDS guidelines. Individual scholars who wish to write such letters for students or colleagues are advised not to address those letters to Israeli institutions (so as not to legitimize them) and instead to use a dossier service such as Interfolio.

Informal mentoring or advising of scholars at Israeli institutions is not covered by the boycott, nor is writing reference letters for jobs or fellowships at non-Israeli institutions.

Research

Conducting research in Israel/Palestine in itself is not covered by the boycott. If carrying out research at Israeli facilities such as archives does not entail official affiliation with those facilities (e.g. in the form of a visiting position), then the activity is not subject to boycott.

If research requires permission from the state of Israel or Israeli academic institutions, then seeking such permission is generally compatible with the boycott as long as the boycott is not violated in any other way. For example, if a precondition for a research license is agreeing to collaborate with Israeli academic institutions or participate in Israeli academic conferences, then scholars should boycott.

Note that under international legal principles, Israel should refrain from conducting archaeological excavations in occupied territories, including east Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. Accordingly, seeking licenses from Israel for any excavations in the territories occupied in 1967 is covered by the boycott.


[This document was reseachered and produced by Anthropologists for the Boycott of Israeli Academic Institutions. Click here to read the press release issued with the document. Click here to download a PDF of the document.]
Tags

  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • Lies, Deceit, and Criminality: Israel & the United States Attack Iran (Part II)

      Lies, Deceit, and Criminality: Israel & the United States Attack Iran (Part II)

      Join us for Part II of our series on the US-Israeli attack on Iran as we discuss the US' recent bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities as well as their national and regional implications.

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 9: Islamophobia, the West, and Genocide with Hatem Bazian

      Long Form Podcast Episode 9: Islamophobia, the West, and Genocide with Hatem Bazian

      Hatem Bazian addresses the historical trajectory of Islamophobia and its significance in understanding geopolitical transformation in the post-Cold War world. As Western ideologues shifted from their focus on the Soviet Union after the Cold War, and increasingly adopted the Clash of Civilizations paradigm to undergird their maintenance of global hegemony, Islam and Muslims replaced communism as the chief bogeyman. Bazian explains how and why this came about, and the centrality Palestine played in its development and operation, both in the West and for Israel. He also addresses US government disciplining of universities and particularly student activists.

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 8: Resigning the State Department Over Gaza With Hala Rharrit

      Long Form Podcast Episode 8: Resigning the State Department Over Gaza With Hala Rharrit

      In this episode of Long Form, Hala Rharrit discusses the factors that led her to resign from the US State Department, the mechanisms by which institutional corruption and ideological commitments of officials and representatives ensure US support for Israel, and how US decision-makers consistently violate international law and US laws/legislation. Rharrit also addresses the Trump administration’s claim that South Africa is perpetrating genocide against the country’s Afrikaaner population, and how this intersects with the US-Israeli campaign of retribution against South Africa for hauling Israel before the ICJ on charges of genocide.
Feb 16, 2011 Lebanon
Jadaliyya Reports By :
Jadaliyya Reports

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 

[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412