CAF's Resource Guide Exposing Canary Mission

CAF's Resource Guide Exposing Canary Mission

CAF's Resource Guide Exposing Canary Mission

By : Committee on Academic Freedom (MESA)

 The Committee on Academic Freedom of the Middle East Studies Association (MESA) today released a resource guide for college and university leaders on actions they can take to counteract a secretive, political organization called Canary Mission that uses its website to engage in defamatory attacks against college students and faculty who engage in advocacy for Palestinian rights and academic inquiry about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  

Exposing Canary Mission: A Resource for College and University Leaders highlights the new and dangerous risk posed by Canary Mission. Unlike pro-Israel advocacy groups that have sought for years to influence how the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is taught on campuses and to stifle student activism in support of Palestinian rights, the targets of Canary Mission are primarily students rather than professors, and those perpetrating its work of defamation and character assassination remain completely anonymous.

Canary Mission poses a particular threat to the future job prospects of today’s college students. Its website openly proclaims that it seeks to prevent the employment of former students it defines as “radicals.” A video on its homepage shows students demonstrating for Palestinian rights followed by shots of an older man in a suit greeting a young man in a corporate lobby while the voiceover states, “A few years later these individuals are applying for a job within your company.... Soon they will be part of your team.”  The video ends with a bold headline that says, “Ensure that Todays’ Radicals are not Tomorrow’s Employees.”

“College leaders, particularly deans of student affairs, need to be aware of how insidious and harmful Canary Mission’s tactics are for their students and develop ways to protect them,” stated Zachary Lockman, chair of the North America wing of MESA’s Committee on Academic Freedom. “These false, misleading and incendiary allegations about students and teachers are producing what is in effect a blacklist, reminiscent of the ’Red Scare’ and McCarthyism. This is a direct and very real threat to academic freedom and free speech on our campuses.”

Tactics employed by Canary Mission include:

  • A website with profiles of nearly 2,000 individual students and faculty that feature personal information, quotes taken out of context, photos, videos, institutional affiliations, and links to friends and colleagues.
  • Refusing to respond to complaints by those it targets or to remove or correct the false allegations and misstatements that appear on its website.
  • Twitter trolling campaigns, linked back to the Canary Mission website.
  • Constant retweeting of its attacks, often dozens of times during the course of a single day so that each attack – no matter how false or outrageous – leaves a trace on the Internet for potential employers to find.

The Committee on Academic Freedom outlines five actions that college leaders and administrators can take to counteract Canary Mission:

  1. Educate oneself about Canary Mission and how it subjects students and faculty to vicious and underhanded attacks that threaten their well-being and the principles of academic freedom and free speech.
  2. Condemn such attacks when they occur.
  3. Defend the campus targets of Canary Mission’s intimidation.
  4. Support publicly the free speech rights of students and student organizations.
  5. Develop effective ways to support affected students through:
    1. Online reputation management
    2. Identifying online trolls
    3. Alerting social media platforms when their services are used to defame students or attack academic freedom and free speech

Exposing Canary Mission: A Resource for College and University Leaders is being sent to leaders at colleges and universities across North America. A particular focus will be getting the resource to the deans of student affairs, who were named in a recent survey of university presidents as the senior staff members that they rely on most when addressing conflict between campus inclusion and free speech.

Judith Tucker, president of the Middle East Studies Association stated, “We encourage college and university administrators to take the lead in first understanding what Canary Mission is truly about and the threat it poses to the integrity of the college community and our academic freedom.  We urge them to then take action to support and protect students and faculty who are under attack.”

For more information, click here

MESA’s Committee on Academic Freedom (CAF) monitors and combats threats to and violations of academic freedom in the Middle East and North Africa and in North America. Such threats and violations include governmental interference with the right of scholars to conduct research, publish their findings, teach as they see fit and travel to international scholarly meetings, as well as instances in which professors and academic researchers are harassed or persecuted for their peaceful professional or personal activities. CAF also combats efforts by organizations based outside of academia to harass and defame faculty and students, and silence discussion and advocacy about current political issues, in order to further their political agendas.

The Middle East Studies Association (MESA) is a non-profit learned society that brings together scholars, educators and those interested in the study of the region from all over the world. From its inception in 1966 with 51 founding members, ME

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412