Middle East Studies Association Statement on Academic Freedom and Corporate Control of Digital Platforms

Middle East Studies Association Statement on Academic Freedom and Corporate Control of Digital Platforms

Middle East Studies Association Statement on Academic Freedom and Corporate Control of Digital Platforms

By : Jadaliyya Reports

[The following statement was issued by the Board of Directors of the Middle East Studies Association on 29 October 2020 in response to censorship by digital platforms (e.g., Zoom) used in educational institutions.]

The expanded use by institutions of higher learning across the United States and Canada of corporate-controlled videoconferencing platforms poses threats to the free and safe exchange of ideas. To uphold their commitment to the principles of academic freedom and vigorously protect freedom of expression and exchange of ideas – the hallmark of the academy — university administrators must address such threats promptly and decisively. The threat posed by corporate control of media platforms is apparent in the recent unilateral actions taken by Zoom to shut down events about Palestine at US universities.

On 23 September 2020, Zoom cancelled a virtual open classroom titled “Whose Narratives? Gender, Justice, Resistance: A Conversation with Leila Khaled,” organized by San Francisco State University (SFSU) Professors Rabab Abdulhadi and Tomomi Kinukawa and sponsored by SFSU’s Arab and Muslim Ethnicities and Diaspora Studies Program and its Women and Gender Studies Department. The communication technology company apparently shut down the program in response to pressures from groups based outside the university seeking to further their political agendas: among them, to limit open discussion of the Palestine/Israel conflict. Zoom claimed that the webinar violated its terms of service with the SFSU even as it affirmed its commitment to the free exchange of ideas. It is ironic, that despite that assertion, Zoom also cancelled two webinars organized at the University of Hawaii at Monoa (UHM) and New York University (NYU) to discuss Zoom’s censorship of the event. The UHM webinar, cosponsored by the Department of Ethnic Studies and Political Science, and the Students and Faculty for Justice in Palestine, was cancelled two days before it was to take place, while the webinar titled “Against the Censorship and Criminalization of Academic Political Speech,” organized by the NYU chapter of the American Association of University Professors and cosponsored by several NYU departments and institutes, was unilaterally cancelled without knowledge of the NYU administration and without prior warning to the organizers on 23 October, the day it was scheduled to be held.

Zoom’s cancellation of the SFSU event poses a threat to the constitutionally protected rights to free speech and the free exchange of ideas within the university. Zoom’s subsequent censorship of academic webinars held to protest its earlier act of censorship is even more egregious; it displays the company’s apparent willingness to suppress the expression of certain viewpoints. While the Palestine/Israel issue is emerging as a testing ground for contestation of academic freedom within corporate-controlled meeting platforms, Zoom’s cancellation of these webinars carries wider implications for the academy. As the Association for Asian Studies’ 20 July 2020 statement has warned, the move to digital platforms for videoconferencing raises concerns about security and academic freedom, particularly for faculty and students teaching and learning about China.

Lynn Mahoney, SFSU’s president, claimed to disagree with Zoom’s decision to cancel the webinar at her university. However, she affirmed its right as a private company to enforce its policies. Her response speaks to the untested terrain that universities must navigate in their dealings with vendors of online meeting platforms. It also underscores the responsibility of university administrators and faculty to educate themselves about how the terms of service of these companies may be at odds with core values of academic freedom. Universities must remain vigilant in protecting the security and academic freedom of their faculty and students.

MESA’s Board of Directors calls on university administrators to robustly defend the academic freedom of their faculty, students, and staff within Zoom and other corporate-controlled virtual meeting platforms.

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412