Call for Abstracts - Gulf Women’s Lives: Voice, Space, Place

Call for Abstracts - Gulf Women’s Lives: Voice, Space, Place

Call for Abstracts - Gulf Women’s Lives: Voice, Space, Place

By : Jadaliyya Reports

Interested authors are invited to submit abstracts to contribute chapters for inclusion in the edited collection "Gulf Women's Lives: Voice, Space, Place". This edited volume will consider Gulf women’s lives by looking at the interrelated fields of writing, gender, and the body, broadly defined. The submissions will emphasize embodiment, conflicts, resistance, agency, identity, disability, and other central notions as experienced in women’s lives and expressed in their narratives.

We intend to investigate how Gulf women negotiate spaces of dissent through their writing, and how their texts convey anti-patriarchy, counter-orientalism, postcolonial and decolonial discourses and discursive practices. By focusing on women’s narratives and productions, the volume will offer a critical perspective on how Gulf women construct themselves as gendered selves and authors, how they negotiate public and private spaces, and how they navigate the societal, cultural and religious restrictions imposed on them in the course of their narratives. As gendered selves, moreover, women authors invest their texts with inscriptions from their bodies, offering a critical and innovative perspective on everyday lives and experiences.

Rather than re-visiting the “Gulf woman” narrative, this volume considers various stories and articulations of narratives and counter-narratives. The narratives are multiple, multifaceted and resist the stereotype of oppressed ‘Gulf women.’ This volume addresses the question of “what is the Gulf woman story” by challenging the narrative - shifting the focus away from linearity and towards an exploration of the complex intricacies binding stories and selves. How do stories shape lives, and how do lives shape storytelling and selves? The process of selving is part of the themes of this book. Placing the self in its relational spectrum (such as the relation of the self to significant others, the body, the environment, and the collective) the volume will consider a wide range of narratives about Gulf women, including from disciplines as diverse as literature, sociology, gender studies, performance studies, cultural studies, oral history, communication and media studies, among others.

The volume is innovative in its transdisciplinary perspective over Gulf women’s experiences, its focus on everyday lives and depictions of women’s worlds, and its broad perspective of women’s expressions. As such, the volume aims to fill a gap in scholarly research. The edited volume seeks to respond to the following questions:

How do Gulf women express/write a room of their own: a physical and psychic space?
What are the writing journeys and reading journeys implicated in the process?
What are the risks associated with writing?
What does writing have to do with imaginaries and geographical spaces?
How does writing become a right in a patriarchal space?
How do individual voices/selves relate to the collective?


We are seeking contributions from practitioners, academics, established as well as junior scholars, journalists, and activists.


Topics may include, but are not limited to:
Representations of
Khaleeji women in literature: novels, short stories, poetry
The written and performed text:
Khaleeji women’s theatre, cinema, documentaries Spoken word poetry and its implications in the Gulf
Gulf women’s oral traditions, testimonies, and oral histories
Socio-political, economic, geographical, time and space contexts of Gulf women’s writing Gulf women’s writing processes
Trauma and violence in Gulf women’s writing
Disability in Gulf women’s writing
Autoethnographies of Gulf women
Language, translingualism and hybridity in Gulf women’s writing
Television representations of
Khaleeji women
Gulf women writers’ specific case studies
Blogging and social media by Gulf women
Biographical and autobiographical narratives of
Khaleeji women
Censorship and self-censorship in Gulf women’s writing
Publics and reception of Gulf women writing
The politics and agency of Gulf women’s writing
Aesthetics and politics in Gulf women writing
Arab women writers as a counter-canon to Western literature
Gulf women as knowledge producers and consumers
Decolonial representations in Gulf women’s expressions

Abstracts Submission


Deadline for abstract submission:
September 15, 2021
Submit via email to all of the editors at the following address:
emabuscemi@hotmail.com
shahdalshammari@gmail.com
ildikokaposi@gmail.com

Timeline


Notification About Acceptance of Abstracts: October 2021 Submission of full papers: 28 February 2022


Detailed 500 to 750-word abstracts should conform to the 7th edition of the APA style manual. They should outline the research topic as well as the theoretical and methodological approach.


All abstracts will be subject to double blind peer review. A short bio should be included.

Editors’ Bios


Emanuela Buscemi
holds a Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of Aberdeen (Scotland) and teaches at the University of Monterrey (Mexico). She previously taught at the American University of Kuwait. Her research interests include alternative social movements, informal activism and resistance, identity and gender politics, performance, agency and belonging in the Arabian Gulf and Latin America. Her work has been featured in the Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, Contemporary Social Science, About Gender-International Journal of Gender Studies, Democratization, as well as in edited volumes published by New York University Press, Routledge, Peter Lang and Palgrave MacMillan. She is the co-author of the edited volume Everyday Youth Practices in the Gulf Peninsula: Changes and Challenges (Routledge, 2020).

Shahd Alshammari holds a Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Kent (UK) and teaches at Gulf University for Science and Technology (Kuwait). Her research interests include illness narratives, Disability Studies, Arab women’s literature, and media representation of illness. Her work has been featured in Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, Life Writing, Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies, Arab Media and Society, and others. She is the author of Notes on the Flesh (Faraxa, 2017) and Head Above Water (Neem Tree Press, 2022). Her creative writing has been featured in Wordgathering: A Journal of Disability Poetry and Literature, Joao Roque Literary Journal, Sukoon Magazine, and others.

Ildiko Kaposi is a social scientist whose work focuses on issues of democracy from the perspective of media and communication. She holds a PhD in political science from Central European University, Budapest, and she has studied the roles of the press and internet in fostering participation in emerging or transitioning democracies in post-communist Europe and the Middle East. Employing mainly qualitative methods, she specialises in in-depth explorations of the intersections of democratic principles and their interpretations in specific social, legal, political, and cultural contexts. She is assistant professor at the Department of Mass Communication and Media of the Gulf University for Science and Technology, Kuwait, where she teaches media law.

  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 8: Resigning the State Department Over Gaza With Hala Rharrit

      Long Form Podcast Episode 8: Resigning the State Department Over Gaza With Hala Rharrit

      In this episode of Long Form, Hala Rharrit discusses the factors that led her to resign from the US State Department, the mechanisms by which institutional corruption and ideological commitments of officials and representatives ensure US support for Israel, and how US decision-makers consistently violate international law and US laws/legislation. Rharrit also addresses the Trump administration’s claim that South Africa is perpetrating genocide against the country’s Afrikaaner population, and how this intersects with the US-Israeli campaign of retribution against South Africa for hauling Israel before the ICJ on charges of genocide.

    • Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      The entire globe stands behind Israel as it faces its most intractable existential crisis since it started its slow-motion Genocide in 1948. People of conscience the world over are in tears as Israel has completely run out of morals and laws to violate during its current faster-paced Genocide in Gaza. Israelis, state and society, feel helpless, like sitting ducks, as they search and scramble for an inkling of hope that they might find one more human value to desecrate, but, alas, their efforts remain futile. They have covered their grounds impeccably and now have to face the music. This is an emergency call for immediate global solidarity with Israel’s quest far a lot more annihilation. Please lend a helping limb.

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 7: Think Tanks and Manufactuing Consent with Mandy Turner (4 June)

      Long Form Podcast Episode 7: Think Tanks and Manufactuing Consent with Mandy Turner (4 June)

      In this episode, Mandy Turner discusses the vital role think tanks play in the policy process, and in manufacturing consent for government policy. Turner recently published a landmark study of leading Western think tanks and their positions on Israel and Palestine, tracing pronounced pro-Israel bias, where the the key role is primarily the work of senior staff within these institutions, the so-called “gatekeepers.”

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412