Press Release: Students for Justice in Palestine at UCLA Charges Student Council Members with Conflict of Interest

Press Release: Students for Justice in Palestine at UCLA Charges Student Council Members with Conflict of Interest

Press Release: Students for Justice in Palestine at UCLA Charges Student Council Members with Conflict of Interest

By : Jadaliyya Reports

[The following press release was issued by Students for Justice in Palestine at the University of California - Los Angeles on 17 May 2014.]

Contact: sjpucla1@gmail.com

In a five-hour hearing held on May 15th, 2014, representatives for Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) argued that two members of the Undergraduate Student Association Council (USAC) had a conflict of interest when they voted on the question of divestment from US companies that profit from the systematic violation of Palestinian human rights. SJP premised its arguments on the fact that both council members enjoyed in-kind benefits including travel, accommodation, meals, and professional networking opportunities provided by pro-Israel lobbying groups. The council members, Sunny Singh and Lauren Rogers, took free trips to Israel under the auspices of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the American Jewish Committee (AJC), respectively, while they held elected offices in the undergraduate student government. SJP alleged to the Judicial Board that the financial value of the trips (estimated to be between $5,000 and $7,000) created a perceived loyalty or obligation to the organizations, which are on record as openly opposing divestment resolutions on college campuses and working with campus groups to defeat them. 

During the trial, SJP provided evidence that the ADL expected participants to “apply what they learned” on the trips through their student leadership positions, and provided a copy of an email message sent by the AJC to Rogers asking her to vote against the divestment resolution. SJP argued that a reasonable observer looking at these facts would believe that the council members` votes may have been influenced by these expectations and communications, and that this "reasonable observer" threshold was sufficient to trigger the conflict of interest clauses in the student government`s bylaws. SJP also clarified that council members should be free to associate with whomever they please, and even to take trips, but that when these associations come with financial or in-kind benefits, extra scrutiny must be applied—especially when explicitly voting on a related issue. SJP asserts that the conflict of interest clause is in place precisely because these matters should not be left to the sole judgement of the council members. After all, that is what the concept of checks and balances is all about. 

SJP rejects Singh and Rogers’ arguments that the case is a political smear campaign. Both defendants argued that the fact that Singh applied for the trip prior to being elected invalidated the claim, that a prior discussion of conflicts of interest in the student government effectively cleared them to participate in future votes, and that the perception of a conflict of interest showed a lack of faith in the council members` ethical judgment.

Members of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the American Jewish Committee (AJC) were present as witnesses for the respondents. Amanda Susskind, ADL Pacific Southwest Regional Director, testified that her organization`s Campus Leaders Mission to Israel never mentioned BDS or divestment and that the organization did not favor student government members in its selection process. Robert Peckar, outgoing executive director of the American Jewish Committee`s Project Interchange, also argued that Rogers` position in student government was not the primary reason she was accepted to the California Student Leaders delegation, but acknowledged that the trip had significant financial value. Such claims fly in the face of the fact that these organizations publicly oppose divestment and specifically recruit student leaders. 

Although some interpret the bylaws as designed to prevent USAC officers from taking actions that could produce a financial benefit for them in the future, SJP asked the court to consider the possibility that a council member’s vote might be based on a benefit they have already received. SJP stressed that if the actions taken by Singh and Rogers were declared acceptable, then other organizations would also be free to provide financial and/or in-kind gifts to council members prior to their votes on important public issues. 

As of this writing, there is no clear timeline for the issuance of a verdict and full opinion, however Judicial Board rules stipulate that no later than two weeks after the verdict, the board will issue a full opinion on the matter.

For more information, see reporting by The Daily Bruin: http://dailybruin.com/2014/05/16/judicial-board-hears-arguments-on-potential-usac-conflict/ 

  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 8: Resigning the State Department Over Gaza With Hala Rharrit

      Long Form Podcast Episode 8: Resigning the State Department Over Gaza With Hala Rharrit

      In this episode of Long Form, Hala Rharrit discusses the factors that led her to resign from the US State Department, the mechanisms by which institutional corruption and ideological commitments of officials and representatives ensure US support for Israel, and how US decision-makers consistently violate international law and US laws/legislation. Rharrit also addresses the Trump administration’s claim that South Africa is perpetrating genocide against the country’s Afrikaaner population, and how this intersects with the US-Israeli campaign of retribution against South Africa for hauling Israel before the ICJ on charges of genocide.

    • Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      The entire globe stands behind Israel as it faces its most intractable existential crisis since it started its slow-motion Genocide in 1948. People of conscience the world over are in tears as Israel has completely run out of morals and laws to violate during its current faster-paced Genocide in Gaza. Israelis, state and society, feel helpless, like sitting ducks, as they search and scramble for an inkling of hope that they might find one more human value to desecrate, but, alas, their efforts remain futile. They have covered their grounds impeccably and now have to face the music. This is an emergency call for immediate global solidarity with Israel’s quest far a lot more annihilation. Please lend a helping limb.

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 7: Think Tanks and Manufactuing Consent with Mandy Turner (4 June)

      Long Form Podcast Episode 7: Think Tanks and Manufactuing Consent with Mandy Turner (4 June)

      In this episode, Mandy Turner discusses the vital role think tanks play in the policy process, and in manufacturing consent for government policy. Turner recently published a landmark study of leading Western think tanks and their positions on Israel and Palestine, tracing pronounced pro-Israel bias, where the the key role is primarily the work of senior staff within these institutions, the so-called “gatekeepers.”

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412