On the Association of Middle East Children and Youth Studies (AMECYS)

On the Association of Middle East Children and Youth Studies (AMECYS)

By : Heidi Morrison and Chiara Diana

The Association of Middle East Children and Youth Studies (AMECYS) is the first academic association for scholars of children and youth in Middle East studies. AMECYS is a private, non-profit, international association for scholars with an interest in the study of children and youth in the Middle East, North Africa, and their diasporic communities. Through interdisciplinary programs, publications, and services, AMECYS promotes innovative scholarship, facilitates global academic exchange, and enhances public understanding about Middle Eastern children and youth in diverse times and places. AMECYS boasts nearly three hundred members and is the newest affiliated organization of MESA.  

AMECYS was founded in 2018 by Heidi Morrison, associate professor at the University of Wisconsin, La Crosse, with the assistance of the following scholars: Suad Joseph (UC Davis), Dylan Baun (University of Alabama in Huntsville), Chiara Diana (Université libre de Bruxelles), Nazan Maksudyan (Centre Marc Bloch (Berlin)), Matthew Parnell (American University in Cairo), Yael Warshel (Penn State), Murat C. Yildiz (Skidmore College), Khedidja Mokeddem (Centre de Recherche en Anthropologie Sociale et Culturelle, Algeria), Leyla Kayhan Elbirlik (Bogazici University), Diana Hatchett (University of Kentucky), Ben Fortna (University of Arizona), Avner Giladi (University of Haifa), and Linda Herrera (University of Illinois).

Since its foundation, the association has launched several activities and initiatives, including a website, three member meetings (MESA 2017 and 2018 and WOCMES 2018), sponsorship of panels and roundtables (“The State and Future of Childhood’s and Youth Studies in the MENA Region” at WOCMES 2018 and “Women and Youth in the Post Uprising Arab World” at MESA 2018), and the sale of tote bags for fundraising. AMECYS holds an annual graduate student paper prize, which in 2018 went to AUC’s Dina Abdelrahman for her “Active Muslims or Active Citizens? A Case Study of Female Muslim Youth in Egypt.” AMECYS is currently launching a new call for the annual graduate student paper prize, which is open this year to papers in both English and French (deadline of submission: 15 March  2019). AMECYS plans to continue to sponsor relevant panels at conferences as well as publish a newsletter, host a syllabi repository on its website, attract institutional members, and organize a Zoom workshop for its members on a critical topic such as refugee children or the youth bulge.

If you would like to contribute to any of these endeavors, and/or become an AMECYS member, please email: amecystudies@gmail.com. Click here to visit AMECYS Facebook Page:

Thoughts from AMCEY's Board Members on Why Children and Youth Matter to Middle East Studies

President Heidi Morrison, University of Wisconsin (La Crosse)

When we open ourselves up to a world that is not centered around adults, we open ourselves up to a conversation about the Middle East that accounts for the majority of the actual lived inhabitants: children and youth. Giving up an adult-centric perspective can be as uncomfortable, yet equally meaningful, as giving up other normative vantage points, such as that of a white, upper-class male. Try to view the world—past, present, and future—through the eyes of a seven year old! What do you see differently?

Board Member Nazan Maksudyan, Centre Marc Bloch (Berlin)

Yaşar Kemal (1923–2015), probably the best novelist in Turkey, conducted a series of journalistic interviews with street children, working children, migrant children, and poor children in the 1970s. In an interview, when asked why he did it, he said: “I do not treat children like kids. If I have a friendship, a relationship with a child, then he or she is my friend, not a child. I do not see them as kids, I do not treat them like a different human species. Why? I never believed that it is right to treat children as kids. They are fully fledged human beings.” I see my work on the history of children and youth in the Ottoman Empire in parallel with the attempt to reformulate and expand the subject, scope, and actors of history writing.  “Bringing the children in” is the product of the conviction that enumeration and multiplication of accounts relating to the same events, eras, and processes contribute to an enriched perception and comprehension of history—not necessarily in the Middle East, but elsewhere as well.

Board Member Suad Joseph, Board Member, UC Davis

Children and youth account for sixty to seventy-five percent of the population of most Middle Eastern countries. There has been an on-going “youth bulge” in the region for a number of years. If for no other reason, the study of children and youth in the Middle East is critical because they are the majority of the population–and indeed, its future.

Board Member Khedidja Mokeddem, CRASC (Algeria)

This age group is numerically important. For example, according to the results of the 2008 population census, nearly half of the Algerian population is between the ages of ten and fifteen (50.94 percent female and 49.06 percent male). The number of Algerians between the ages of fourteen and twenty-five is 3,573,027, of which 18,187,77 are adolescent girls and 175,480 are adolescent boys. Young people are the spine of human development.

Board Member Leyla Kayhan Elbirlik, Bogazici University

Any effort in raising the voices of children and youth, uncovering their stories and lived experiences would be considered a great contribution to historical scholarship. The subject of children and youth in Middle Eastern studies is a challenge especially due to the limitation of written and oral sources from the early modern period. I am tempted to compare the work of the historian of that period to that of an archeologist, carefully excavating, identifying and parsing the material to offer a glimpse into an obscure area of life. The lives of children and youth, their shared and individual experiences also tell us about the way society constructs and reconstructs itself. Hence, in Middle Eastern studies where archival resources on family life, personal and private correspondences, autobiographical records are considerably meagre, children and youth studies will contribute significantly to the field. Most importantly, considering children and youth as active historical agents will help establish this subject as a major category of scholarly research within world history.

Board Member and Program Officer Dylan Baun, University of Alabama in Huntsville

Young people matter in Middle East Studies because they have been invisible for so long. While they are participants in all types of social change, ranging from revolutions to reading practices, children and youth in the Middle East have often been at the fringes of scholarship and public media and framed as susceptible to cooption and manipulation. And, finally, when young protestors were in the limelight during the 2011 Arab Uprisings, they were depicted as dormant under authoritarian governments until recently and unknowing of what they truly want. The reality is much more complex, where young people across the region, since at least the nineteenth century, have been both sites of empowerment and control.  By putting young people and their material evidence--from diaries to clothing choices--at the center, researchers can work to contextualize this paradox and assess its impacts.  The results are not always uplifting, but they render a most significant group in Middle East society more visible.

Board Member and Secretary Chiara Diana, Université libre de Bruxelles (Belgium)

Common perceptions of children are based on their age as minors and on them lacking experience and a sense of responsibility. These characteristics are often employed as a rationale for excluding them from the adult world. Being underage tends to place children at the bottom of the social scale, as legally incompetent citizens and deprived of the right to responsibility for their own lives. This situation causes discrimination against them and allows adults to establish a social order to the detriment of very young people’s participation in society. On the contrary, children and young people in the Middle East and North Africa region prove that they are political, cultural and economic agents through their political and citizen activism, collective and individual artistic actions, and extensive participation in the (in)formal labor market (i.e., about fifteen percent of children in the region are child laborers). That is to say that children and youth matter and Middle East studies academics cannot continue to ignore this important group. They deserve specialized attention from scholars working on the region in order to make them more visible and to recognise their agency in past as well as in present Middle Eastern and North African societies.

The Ottoman History Podcast recently hosted three AMECYS members (Heidi Morrison, Dylan Baun, and Murat Yildiz) to discuss the field of the history of childhood and youth on the Ottoman History Podcast. We reproduce that episode with this annoumcement.

Education in the Time of Virality

Widespread access to the internet has facilitated means of acquiring news and information at rates unseen in earlier eras. As individuals, we have the ability to post and spread political information, social commentary, and other thoughts at will. This has caused an information overload for users of social networking sites. In a fight for views, reposts, and clicks, creators, both corporate and not, have been forced to develop new tactics to inform their audiences. This response to a new mode of information consumption also forces a reconsideration of how we understand knowledge production. Much of the information put forth into the world is absorbed passively, such as through characters’ storylines in books, films, and television - and this information accumulates over a lifetime. What, then, happens when knowledge is actively consumed (as is done when reading, watching, or listening to news stories), but the manner through which the information is presented still conforms to the brevity generally associated with more passive knowledge intake?

Pew Research estimates that over 70% of Americans use their phone to read the news. This is nearly a 25% increase since 2013. The constant barrage of advertisements in online articles does not make consuming news easy to do on a phone, thereby forcing media outlets and their competitors to change and adopt new tactics. Applications such as Flipboard have tried to mitigate these frustrations by simply providing the full article without the ads on their own platform, but many people still turn to sources like The Skimm. In attempting to distill a day’s worth of news coverage on domestic affairs, foreign affairs, pop culture, and sports into a few quips, undeniably both texture and nuance are lost. To compete with these services, CNN, the New York Times, and other mainstream news sources are doing the same and producing articles that give the, “Top 5 News Moments to Start Your Day,” or a, “Daily Brief.” Of course, looking at the language differences between the New York Times daily summary versus The Skimm’s, one can tell which is a more comprehensive news source. Even so, slashing the word count still takes a toll on clearly informing the public. The question then becomes, after quickly skimming through these summaries, are people doing more readings to cover what was lost? Or has “the brief” become the new standard for knowledge production and awareness?

It is more than likely that a significant portion of The Skimm’s subscribers do go on to read the full article linked in the email, but the growing popularity of similarly quick and fast news sources has had an impact on how much information viewers and readers actually understand. Between 2011 and 2014, The Skimm was founded, along with AJ+, Now This, Upworthy, and BuzzFeed News’ more serious journalism section. Undeniably, all of these sources produce and publish very important information, and make this information accessible to a larger audience. However, their production and marketing strategies hinge upon condensing very nuanced topics into videos that are, on average, only seven minutes long, as well as optimizing their materials for social media audiences. Now, it is ridiculous to expect highly textured and complicated issues to be thoroughly represented in these videos or posts. Even research based texts do not touch upon all of the complexities of a topic. The problems arise when looking at how viewers perceive themselves and their level of knowledge after actively searching out the products of, for example, AJ+ and Buzzfeed, for information. Carefully refining their materials to fit the shortened attention span of people scrolling through Facebook, social media news organizations have found their niche audience. Their products provide a simple way to deliver information to those who want gather knowledge on the “hot topics of today,” but do not what to do the leg work to be truly informed. These videos are spread throughout Facebook, Twitter, and other social media platforms in a manner that says, “Watch this, and you will know what is going on in the world.”

Understanding how information is being pushed out into the world is almost as important as the content of the information. None of these outlets claim to provide comprehensive knowledge, but in being popular sites for information, the question becomes: do they have a responsibility to encourage their viewers to continue to inform themselves about these issues? Having a well-informed society is phenomenal, but if in informing society we are also forever altering how we consume knowledge to favor brevity over nuance, what consequences could come with this change? We must ensure that the consumption of these videos does not become a license for people to see themselves as truly informed and thus appropriate for them to take the microphones at protests and speak over those who have a solid and textured understanding of the issues. Information content is incredibly important, as is spreading knowledge, and AJ+, Now This, and the like have become important role models in showing how issues should be accessible to everyone and not clouted in jargon. But we must simultaneously consider the unintended side effects that these styles of videos have on knowledge production. Ultimately, it is a mutual effort. Just as producers must be watchful of their content and method of dissemination, we as consumers must be mindful of how we digest and understand the news we take in.


[This article was published originally Tadween`s Al-Diwan blog by Diwan`s editor, Mekarem Eljamal.]