Essential Readings: The Iraqi Revolution of 1958 (by Sara Pursley)

Essential Readings: The Iraqi Revolution of 1958 (by Sara Pursley)

Essential Readings: The Iraqi Revolution of 1958 (by Sara Pursley)

By : Sara Pursley and the Middle East Studies Pedagogy Initiative (MESPI)

[The Essential Readings series is curated by the Middle East Studies Pedagogy Initiative (MESPI) team at the Arab Studies Institute. MESPI invites scholars to contribute to our Essential Readings modules by submitting an “Essential Readings” list on a topic/theme pertinent to their research/specialization in Middle East studies. Authors are asked to keep the selection relatively short while providing as much representation/diversity as possible. This difficult task may ultimately leave out numerous works which merit inclusion from different vantage points. Each topic may eventually be addressed by more than one author. Articles such as this will appear permanently on www.MESPI.org and www.Jadaliyya.com. Email us at info@MESPI.org for any inquiries.]

Technically a military coup, the event of 14 July 1958 in Iraq has long been considered a revolution, due both to the immense popular support it received at the time and to the political and social changes it enacted, including an overthrow of the British-backed Hashemite monarchy and a land reform program that limited the power of the large landowning class. The event has also been of interest to historians because of the flourishing of political and cultural activity during the “revolutionary era” and because the ending of this era, with the first Ba`th coup of 8 February 1963, is often seen as marking a “failure” that needs to be explained. English-language scholarship on the revolution is nevertheless fairly limited, reflecting to some extent the state of the field on modern Iraqi history generally. The historiographical work that does exist has tended to focus on either political or intellectual history, and most of it does not deal solely with the revolutionary era (1958-63) but includes the Hashemite period (1920-58) as well. There are some economic histories related to the revolution though most of these focus on factors leading up to it in the preceding decades; there are few historical studies addressing socioeconomic themes during the revolutionary period itself.
 

Dann, Uriel. Iraq Under Qassem: A Political History, 1958-1963. Israel Universities Press, 1969. 


This book remains one of the most focused English-language political histories of the Qasim era and, unlike some similar works, includes a discussion of some of the main social laws and policies of Qasim’s government, including the Personal Status Law and the law for social institutions. It also contains some interesting photos and press images from the period. Otherwise, it is not terribly useful analytically, reproducing the “artificial state” narrative in its most superficial and problematic form: the Shi`a are “backward socially and economically”; the Kurds are “self-assertive” and “martial”; the Turkmen are “conspicuous enough to invite aggression” (p. 2); and, more generally, violence in Iraq “pervades the vast substrata of the people outside[!] the sphere of power politics.”[i] For a shorter but analytically more solid political history of the Qasim era, see Chapter 2 of Farouk-Sluglett, Marion and Peter Sluglett. Iraq Since 1958: From Revolution to Dictatorship. I. B. Tauris, 2001.

Batatu, Hanna. The Old Social Classes and the Revolutionary Movements of Iraq. Princeton University Press, 1978.


More than forty years after its publication, Batatu’s magnum opus remains the classic work on the 1958 revolution and the decades of socio-economic and political change leading up to it. As Joe Stork wrote in MERIP in 1981: “Hanna Batatu has constructed a masterpiece of historical literature that singlehandedly catapults Iraq from the least known of the major Arab countries to the Arab society of which we now have the most thorough political portrait.”[ii] A massive tome that is really three books in one, totaling over 1,200 pages, it is an explicitly Marxist-Weberian analysis of Iraqi society that foregrounds questions of class and socioeconomic change, though only the first of the three parts focuses substantially on class analysis and none engages in sustained analysis of subaltern mobilization. The second and third parts provide invaluable political histories of, respectively, the Iraqi communist movement from the 1920s to the 1950s and the Communist and Ba`th parties during and after the 1958 revolution. All historians of twentieth-century Iraq, and especially those dealing with the revolution, continue to engage with Batatu’s work, including for its detailed narratives and charts drawing on extensive sources to which few or no other scholars have ever had access.
 

Fernea, Robert and Wm. Roger Louis, eds. The Iraqi Revolution of 1958: The Old Social Classes Revisited. I.B. Tauris, 1991. 


Covering a wide range of political, socioeconomic, and cultural themes related to the revolution, each chapter of this collection engages in some way with Batatu’s 1978 work; the volume concludes with a response by Batatu. Five chapters deal with the larger global and regional context of the revolution, covering British (Wm. Roger Louis), US (Nicholas Thacher and Frederick Alexgard), Soviet (Joe Stork), and Arab (Rashid Khalidi) entanglements. Three essays—by Marion Farouk Sluglett and Peter Sluglett, Robert Fernea, and Roger Owen—push Batatu on questions of class and the nature and role of the Iraqi state. Abdul-Salaan Yousif explores the “the struggle for cultural hegemony” before and during the revolution, focusing especially on Iraqi intellectuals and artists engaged with Marxism. And Sami Zubaida considers questions of communalism and minorities.

Louis, Wm. Roger and Roger Owen, eds. A Revolutionary Year: The Middle East in 1958. I.B. Tauris, 2002.


This set of essays explores connections and reverberations between some major events in the Arab world that occurred in 1958: the union of Egypt and Syria in the United Arab Republic; the political crisis in Lebanon leading to a US intervention; and the Iraqi revolution. While the editors of the volume conclude that the revolution was mainly an internal affair, the work usefully situates the event within its regional context and provides valuable discussions of the shifting policies of Egypt, the United States, the Soviet Union, and Israel toward the unfolding events. For a more recent analysis of the regional 1958, see Schayegh, Cyrus. “1958 Reconsidered: State Formation and the Cold War in the Early Postcolonial Arab Middle East.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 45 (2013): 421-43.

Ismael, Tareq. The Rise and Fall of the Communist Party of Iraq. Cambridge University Press, 2008.


Only one chapter of this history of the Iraqi Communist Party focuses on the revolution, but it is a detailed one and covers the internal political struggles within the party from 1958-63, Qasim’s crackdown on the party’s popular front organizations, and the ICP’s turn against Qasim in response to his suppression of the Kurdish national movement. It also includes one of the most explicit and devastating accounts in an English-language academic work of the torture and slaughter of communists after the 1963 Ba`th coup. A similarly themed work is Franzén, Johan. Red Star Over Iraq: Iraqi Communism Before Saddam. Hurst & Co, 2011. The chapter on the revolutionary era mainly covers familiar ground, such as the public positions of the ICP and its struggle with Arab nationalists, but includes a useful discussion of the ICP’s relation to the Soviet and Chinese communist parties.
 

Haj, Samira. The Making of Iraq, 1900-1963: Capital, Power, and Ideology. State University of New York Press, 1997.


Samira Haj explores the socioeconomic and political forces leading to the revolution, arguing that “agrarianism, not oil, is the crucial variable” shaping Iraq’s social structure in this period (p. 1). Oil revenues were channeled largely to promote the interests of the existing “tribal oligarchy,” whose power had been consolidated by British and monarchical policy but also dated to late Ottoman transformations, further fueling class conflict between this landowning class and peasant sharecroppers. Haj challenges both dependency and modernization theory for not fully recognizing the importance of internal forces in shaping Iraq’s history. The later chapters and the epilogue of the work consider questions of colonial modernity and national formation, focusing especially on how the modern Iraqi state, in both the colonial and independent periods, worked to produce political, ethnic, and religious difference, and how the postcolonial state legitimized itself through the discourse of development. For other works analyzing socioeconomic factors in the decades leading up to the revolution, see Farouk-Sluglett, Marion and Peter Sluglett. “Labor and National Liberation: The Trade Union Movement in Iraq, 1920-1958.” Arab Studies Quarterly 5, no. 2 (1993): 139-47 Farouk-Sluglett, Marion and Peter Sluglett. “The Transformation of Land Tenure and Rural Social Structure in Central and Southern Iraq, C. 1870-1958.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 40, no. 1 (2008): 3-5; and Fuccaro, Nelida. “Reading Oil as Urban Violence: Kirkuk and Its Oil Conurbation, 1927-58.” In Urban Violence in the Middle East: Changing Cityscapes in the Transition from Empire to Nation State. edited by Ulrike Freitag et al. New York: Berghahn Books, 2015.

Bashkin, Orit. The Other Iraq: Pluralism and Culture in Hashemite Iraq. Stanford University Press, 2009. 


Focused on the Hashemite era, this work thoroughly explores the intellectual roots of the revolution. Hybridity and pluralism are central themes, as indicated in the book’s title The Other Iraq. These concepts are employed both analytically, for example to highlight the hybrid aspects of Iraqi anticolonial thought as it engaged with colonial concepts, and empirically, in exploring how the pluralism of Iraqi society was reflected in debates around religious, ethnic, class, and urban/rural differences. Among other important interventions, Bashkin shows how there was no clear line between Arabist and Iraqi territorial national identities in the Hashemite era. She develops this argument explicitly for the Qasim period (often seen as the climax of the Arabism-Iraqism battle) in a later article, “Hybrid Nationalism: Watani and Qawmi Visions in Iraq under `Abd al-Karim Qasim, 1958-61.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 43, no. 2 (2011): 293-312. For a somewhat contrasting argument, which places the Arabist-Iraqist divide at the center of modern Iraqi history (albeit while seeing some overlaps of the kind Bashkin highlights), see Davis, Eric. Memories of State: Politics, History, and Collective Identity in Modern Iraq. University of California Press, 2005.

Pursley, Sara. Familiar Futures: Time, Selfhood, and Sovereignty in Iraq. Stanford University Press, 2019.


My book considers the role of gender and family reform projects in the Hashemite and revolutionary eras, focusing on how such projects were mobilized in the name of modernity, sovereignty, and development but often ended up working to defer change to an ever-receding future. Chapters 6 and 7 look at two conflicts related to gender roles and women’s rights during the Qasim era, the first over a rural literacy project organized by communist women and the second over the Iraqi Personal Status of 1959. The book’s epilogue explores the Monument to Freedom by the Iraqi artist Jawad Salim as a way to consider other ways of thinking about revolutionary time and political change beyond those enshrined in linear modernization narratives, with their paradoxical tendencies toward temporal deferral. On women’s issues in the revolutionary years, see also Efrati, Noga. “Negotiating Rights in Iraq: Women and the Personal Status Law.” Middle East Journal 59, no. 4 (2005): 577–95.

Two areas stand out to me as especially critical for future work on the 1958 revolution. First, focused studies on how the revolution unfolded in regions outside Baghdad are badly needed. My own work has suggested the importance of rural rebellion in southern Iraq, and efforts to contain it, to the trajectory of events in the capital, but only scratched the surface of this history. There is still surprisingly little work on the role of the politicized culture of the Shi`i shrine cities (and even Shi`i neighborhoods of Baghdad) during the revolutionary era, though some very suggestive observations were made several decades ago in Sami Zubaida. Islam, People and the State: Political Ideas and Movements in the Middle East. I. B. Tauris, 1993. Chapter 4. For the northern regions, much remains to be done, but a recent example of promising trends is Arbella Bet-Shlimon, City of Black Gold: Oil, Ethnicity, and the Making of Modern Kirkuk. Stanford University Press, 2019. Chapter 4 focuses on the well-known clash in Kirkuk on the first anniversary of the revolution between Kurdish communist workers and Turkmen anti-communists that became an ethnicized conflict in which dozens, mainly Turkmens, were killed, and that contributed to the decline in popularity of the Iraqi Communist Party nationally.

The second (related) area calling out for new research has to do with the widespread subaltern mobilizations of these years, both in and outside of Baghdad. One of the arguments of my book is that family reform interventions from 1958-63 were related to the construction of a domain of “the social,” a project implicated in efforts to demobilize both the leftist political organizations and the rural and urban popular strata. While there are many studies addressing the struggles among the central political parties and between the parties and the Qasim government, and while the existence of significant rural and urban subaltern mobilizations during these years is indisputable, we have very little understanding of the connections between these different layers of sociopolitical mobilization.

 



[i] For an extended critique of the artificial state narrative, see Sara Pursley, “‘Lines Drawn on an Empty Map’: Iraq’s Borders and the Legend of the Artificial State,” Jadaliyya, 2 June, 1015, Part I. (http://www.jadaliyya.com/Details/32140/) and Part II (http://www.jadaliyya.com/Details/32153).

[ii] Joe Stork, MERIP Reports (June 1981), 23.

Education in the Time of Virality

Widespread access to the internet has facilitated means of acquiring news and information at rates unseen in earlier eras. As individuals, we have the ability to post and spread political information, social commentary, and other thoughts at will. This has caused an information overload for users of social networking sites. In a fight for views, reposts, and clicks, creators, both corporate and not, have been forced to develop new tactics to inform their audiences. This response to a new mode of information consumption also forces a reconsideration of how we understand knowledge production. Much of the information put forth into the world is absorbed passively, such as through characters’ storylines in books, films, and television - and this information accumulates over a lifetime. What, then, happens when knowledge is actively consumed (as is done when reading, watching, or listening to news stories), but the manner through which the information is presented still conforms to the brevity generally associated with more passive knowledge intake?

Pew Research estimates that over 70% of Americans use their phone to read the news. This is nearly a 25% increase since 2013. The constant barrage of advertisements in online articles does not make consuming news easy to do on a phone, thereby forcing media outlets and their competitors to change and adopt new tactics. Applications such as Flipboard have tried to mitigate these frustrations by simply providing the full article without the ads on their own platform, but many people still turn to sources like The Skimm. In attempting to distill a day’s worth of news coverage on domestic affairs, foreign affairs, pop culture, and sports into a few quips, undeniably both texture and nuance are lost. To compete with these services, CNN, the New York Times, and other mainstream news sources are doing the same and producing articles that give the, “Top 5 News Moments to Start Your Day,” or a, “Daily Brief.” Of course, looking at the language differences between the New York Times daily summary versus The Skimm’s, one can tell which is a more comprehensive news source. Even so, slashing the word count still takes a toll on clearly informing the public. The question then becomes, after quickly skimming through these summaries, are people doing more readings to cover what was lost? Or has “the brief” become the new standard for knowledge production and awareness?

It is more than likely that a significant portion of The Skimm’s subscribers do go on to read the full article linked in the email, but the growing popularity of similarly quick and fast news sources has had an impact on how much information viewers and readers actually understand. Between 2011 and 2014, The Skimm was founded, along with AJ+, Now This, Upworthy, and BuzzFeed News’ more serious journalism section. Undeniably, all of these sources produce and publish very important information, and make this information accessible to a larger audience. However, their production and marketing strategies hinge upon condensing very nuanced topics into videos that are, on average, only seven minutes long, as well as optimizing their materials for social media audiences. Now, it is ridiculous to expect highly textured and complicated issues to be thoroughly represented in these videos or posts. Even research based texts do not touch upon all of the complexities of a topic. The problems arise when looking at how viewers perceive themselves and their level of knowledge after actively searching out the products of, for example, AJ+ and Buzzfeed, for information. Carefully refining their materials to fit the shortened attention span of people scrolling through Facebook, social media news organizations have found their niche audience. Their products provide a simple way to deliver information to those who want gather knowledge on the “hot topics of today,” but do not what to do the leg work to be truly informed. These videos are spread throughout Facebook, Twitter, and other social media platforms in a manner that says, “Watch this, and you will know what is going on in the world.”

Understanding how information is being pushed out into the world is almost as important as the content of the information. None of these outlets claim to provide comprehensive knowledge, but in being popular sites for information, the question becomes: do they have a responsibility to encourage their viewers to continue to inform themselves about these issues? Having a well-informed society is phenomenal, but if in informing society we are also forever altering how we consume knowledge to favor brevity over nuance, what consequences could come with this change? We must ensure that the consumption of these videos does not become a license for people to see themselves as truly informed and thus appropriate for them to take the microphones at protests and speak over those who have a solid and textured understanding of the issues. Information content is incredibly important, as is spreading knowledge, and AJ+, Now This, and the like have become important role models in showing how issues should be accessible to everyone and not clouted in jargon. But we must simultaneously consider the unintended side effects that these styles of videos have on knowledge production. Ultimately, it is a mutual effort. Just as producers must be watchful of their content and method of dissemination, we as consumers must be mindful of how we digest and understand the news we take in.


[This article was published originally Tadween`s Al-Diwan blog by Diwan`s editor, Mekarem Eljamal.]

Education in the Time of Virality

Widespread access to the internet has facilitated means of acquiring news and information at rates unseen in earlier eras. As individuals, we have the ability to post and spread political information, social commentary, and other thoughts at will. This has caused an information overload for users of social networking sites. In a fight for views, reposts, and clicks, creators, both corporate and not, have been forced to develop new tactics to inform their audiences. This response to a new mode of information consumption also forces a reconsideration of how we understand knowledge production. Much of the information put forth into the world is absorbed passively, such as through characters’ storylines in books, films, and television - and this information accumulates over a lifetime. What, then, happens when knowledge is actively consumed (as is done when reading, watching, or listening to news stories), but the manner through which the information is presented still conforms to the brevity generally associated with more passive knowledge intake?

Pew Research estimates that over 70% of Americans use their phone to read the news. This is nearly a 25% increase since 2013. The constant barrage of advertisements in online articles does not make consuming news easy to do on a phone, thereby forcing media outlets and their competitors to change and adopt new tactics. Applications such as Flipboard have tried to mitigate these frustrations by simply providing the full article without the ads on their own platform, but many people still turn to sources like The Skimm. In attempting to distill a day’s worth of news coverage on domestic affairs, foreign affairs, pop culture, and sports into a few quips, undeniably both texture and nuance are lost. To compete with these services, CNN, the New York Times, and other mainstream news sources are doing the same and producing articles that give the, “Top 5 News Moments to Start Your Day,” or a, “Daily Brief.” Of course, looking at the language differences between the New York Times daily summary versus The Skimm’s, one can tell which is a more comprehensive news source. Even so, slashing the word count still takes a toll on clearly informing the public. The question then becomes, after quickly skimming through these summaries, are people doing more readings to cover what was lost? Or has “the brief” become the new standard for knowledge production and awareness?

It is more than likely that a significant portion of The Skimm’s subscribers do go on to read the full article linked in the email, but the growing popularity of similarly quick and fast news sources has had an impact on how much information viewers and readers actually understand. Between 2011 and 2014, The Skimm was founded, along with AJ+, Now This, Upworthy, and BuzzFeed News’ more serious journalism section. Undeniably, all of these sources produce and publish very important information, and make this information accessible to a larger audience. However, their production and marketing strategies hinge upon condensing very nuanced topics into videos that are, on average, only seven minutes long, as well as optimizing their materials for social media audiences. Now, it is ridiculous to expect highly textured and complicated issues to be thoroughly represented in these videos or posts. Even research based texts do not touch upon all of the complexities of a topic. The problems arise when looking at how viewers perceive themselves and their level of knowledge after actively searching out the products of, for example, AJ+ and Buzzfeed, for information. Carefully refining their materials to fit the shortened attention span of people scrolling through Facebook, social media news organizations have found their niche audience. Their products provide a simple way to deliver information to those who want gather knowledge on the “hot topics of today,” but do not what to do the leg work to be truly informed. These videos are spread throughout Facebook, Twitter, and other social media platforms in a manner that says, “Watch this, and you will know what is going on in the world.”

Understanding how information is being pushed out into the world is almost as important as the content of the information. None of these outlets claim to provide comprehensive knowledge, but in being popular sites for information, the question becomes: do they have a responsibility to encourage their viewers to continue to inform themselves about these issues? Having a well-informed society is phenomenal, but if in informing society we are also forever altering how we consume knowledge to favor brevity over nuance, what consequences could come with this change? We must ensure that the consumption of these videos does not become a license for people to see themselves as truly informed and thus appropriate for them to take the microphones at protests and speak over those who have a solid and textured understanding of the issues. Information content is incredibly important, as is spreading knowledge, and AJ+, Now This, and the like have become important role models in showing how issues should be accessible to everyone and not clouted in jargon. But we must simultaneously consider the unintended side effects that these styles of videos have on knowledge production. Ultimately, it is a mutual effort. Just as producers must be watchful of their content and method of dissemination, we as consumers must be mindful of how we digest and understand the news we take in.


[This article was published originally Tadween`s Al-Diwan blog by Diwan`s editor, Mekarem Eljamal.]