CAF Letter Condemning UAE Prosecution and Sentencing of Matthew Hedges

CAF Letter Condemning UAE Prosecution and Sentencing of Matthew Hedges

CAF Letter Condemning UAE Prosecution and Sentencing of Matthew Hedges

By : Committee on Academic Freedom (MESA)

HH Sheikh Mohammad Bin Rashid Al Maktoum Prime Minister’s Office
PO Box: 212000
Dubai, United Arab Emirates

Fax: +971 4 330 404

info@primeminister.ae

HE Sheikh Saif bin Zayed Al Nahyan
Minister of Interior
Zayed Sport City, Arab Gulf Street, Near to Shaikh Zayed Mosque PO Box: 398, Abu Dhabi
United Arab Emirates
Fax: +971 2 402 2762 / +971 2 441 5780
moi@moi.gov.ae

HE Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan
Minister of Foreign Affairs
Al Bateen, King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud Street Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Fax +971 02 444 7766
info@mofa.gov.ae

Your Highness, Your Excellencies,

We write to you on behalf of the Committee on Academic Freedom of the Middle East Studies Association of North America (MESA) and the Executive Committee of the Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies (ASEEES) to condemn the sentencing of a British PhD student, Matthew Hedges, to life imprisonment for ‘spying’ on behalf of the United Kingdom’s Secret Intelligence Service, after a court hearing that lasted only five minutes and on the basis of an alleged confession that may have been obtained under duress. MESA’s Committee on Academic Freedom previously wrote to you on 21 October 2018 to express its profound concern at Mr. Hedges’ treatment and the severity of the charges made against him. We believe that Mr. Hedges’ conviction for espionage betrays a fundamental and/or willful misunderstanding of the nature of field-based academic research, and that the extraordinarily disproportionate nature of his sentence will inflict incalculable damage on the reputation of the UAE as a safe and welcoming place for students and scholars conducting research in and on your country.

Matthew Hedges is a PhD student in the School of Government and International Affairs at Durham University in the United Kingdom. His dissertation focuses on civil-military relations in the UAE and examines how concepts of regime security have evolved since 2011. Mr. Hedges was detained at passport control at Dubai

Re: Sentencing of British PhD student Matthew Hedges November 25, 2018
Page 2

International Airport on 5 May 2018 as he was preparing to return to the UK after a two-week research trip to the UAE. After being taken against his will to Abu Dhabi, he was held in solitary confinement in degrading conditions with only very sporadic access to British consular officials and his family. Mr. Hedges was granted legal representation only on 10 October, more than five months after his arrest, and his court-appointed lawyer was not present when the Federal Court of Appeals in Abu Dhabi convicted him of spying on 21 November.

Although government officials and state-linked media in the UAE have stated that Mr. Hedges has confessed to ‘spying’ and that this judgement is backed by ‘powerful and compelling’ evidence taken from his laptop and electronic devices, no such evidence has been produced to back up these allegations. Abdulkhaleq Abdulla, a prominent academic in the UAE who has stated categorically that Mr. Hedges is a spy, admitted in a BBC interview on 21 November that he had not actually seen any of the ‘solid evidence’ he had referred to previously in judging Mr. Hedges’ guilt. The British government maintains that the allegations of espionage are without foundation and the Foreign Secretary, Jeremy Hunt, has stated ‘We have seen no evidence to back up charges against him.’

In addition to our concern at the severity, opacity, and lack of transparency in the charges against Mr. Hedges, we are deeply alarmed by a suggestion in Gulf News, a Dubai-based English-language newspaper, that Mr. Hedges may have been reported to the authorities by one of his interviewees. We see disturbing parallels with the case of Giulio Regeni, an Italian PhD candidate at the University of Cambridge, who was reported to the Egyptian authorities by one of his interviewees in January 2016, and was later abducted, tortured, and killed. While Mr. Hedges has, thankfully, avoided the appalling fate that befell Mr. Regeni, we are concerned that other scholars and students may be entrapped by the significant yet undeclared shift in the ‘red lines’ of state security in the UAE.

Your Highness, Your Excellencies, MESA’s Committee on Academic Freedom has written to you repeatedly in recent years to deplore the ongoing suppression of freedom of expression, arrest and imprisonment of dissenting voices, including Emirati academics, and the use of security lists to regulate and deny access to foreign scholars and students you deem critical of any aspect of UAE policy. This pattern of activity informed the decision of MESA’s Board of Directors to issue a press release on Deteriorating Security Conditions for Researchers in the United Arab Emirates on 15 November 2018. The statement drew attention to the “worsening situation for academic pursuits and projects in the UAE” and urged scholars and students planning to travel to your country for field research “to take careful note of prevailing conditions, reflect carefully, and exercise caution.” Our concern at the hostile landscape for research in the UAE is reinforced many times over by the decision to sentence a PhD student to life imprisonment simply for asking questions while conducting dissertation fieldwork.

Re: Sentencing of British PhD student Matthew Hedges November 25, 2018
Page 3

We urge the authorities in the UAE to consider the impact of Mr. Hedges’ case and sentencing on the UAE’s heavy investment in branding itself as a regional innovation and knowledge-friendly hub, supported by academic partnerships with academic institutions worldwide. These initiatives have been effective tools of soft power and cultural influence, but the treatment of Mr. Hedges has sent shockwaves throughout the academic community and prompted letters of concern from other scholarly organizations. More than 600 academics from around the world have signed a letter calling for Mr. Hedges’ immediate release, and a petition in support of Mr. Hedges has gathered more than 200,000 signatories. While we welcome reports that your government is considering a plea for clemency lodged by Mr. Hedges’ family, a pardon cannot undo the damage that has already been inflicted upon the UAE as a safe place and welcoming environment for research. We call on you to release Mr. Hedges and reaffirm the right of scholars and students to conduct legitimate academic fieldwork and research without fear of being reported to State Security on grounds that misrepresent the nature and purpose of scholarly inquiry.

Sincerely,

Judith E. Tucker
MESA President
Professor, Georgetown University

Julie A. Cassiday
ASEEES President Professor, Williams College

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412